International and European Law

Organisational unit: Department

  1. 2019
  2. Published
  3. Published
    Mulder, C., & Blokhuis, N. (2019). Tactics for D: A methodology for EQE Paper D. (4 ed.) Eindhoven: Helze BV Publisher.
  4. Published
    Pohl, J. H. (2019). A blueprint for a plurilateral WTO Arbitration Agreement under Article 25 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding. In D. Prévost, I. Alexovicova, & J. Hillebrand Pohl (Eds.), Restoring trust in trade: Liber amicorum in honour of Peter Van den Bossche (pp. 139-155). London: Hart.
  5. Published
  6. Published
  7. Published
  8. 2018
  9. Published
  10. Published
  11. Published
    Melin, P. (Author). (2018). The global compact for migration: Cracks in unity of EU representation. Web publication/site, Brussels: European Union.
  12. Published
    Reslow, N. (2018). Making and implementing multi-actor EU external migration policy: the mobility partnerships. In S. Carrera, L. den Hertog, D. Kostakopoulou, & M. Panizzon (Eds.), EU external migration policies in an era of global mobilities: Intersecting policy universes (pp. 277–298 ). (Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy in Europe; Vol. 44). Leiden: Brill | Nijhoff. DOI: 10.1163/9789004354234_013
  13. Published
    Vankova, Z. (2018). The EU’s Approach to Circular Migration in the Context of the Eastern Partnership Neighbourhood. In S. Carrera, L. den Hertog, D. Kostakopoulou, & M. Panizzon (Eds.), EU external migration policies in an era of global mobilities: Intersecting policy universes (pp. 155-176). (Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy in Europe; Vol. 44). Leiden: Brill | Nijhoff. DOI: 10.1163/9789004354234_008
  14. Published
    Waddington, L., & Poulos, A. (2018). The right to health of children with disabilities in international law. In J. H. H. M. Dorscheidt, & J. E. Doek (Eds.), Children’s rights in health care (pp. 357-381). Leiden: Brill. DOI: 10.1163/9789004327573_016
  15. Published
    Kamperman Sanders, A. (2018). Incentives and obstacles for innovation. In D. Prévost, I. Alexovicova, & J. Hillebrand Pohl (Eds.), Restoring trust in trade: Liber Amicorum in honour of Peter van den Bossche (pp. 199-218). Oxford, London, New York, New Delhi, Sydney: Hart Publishing.
  16. Published
  17. Published
  18. Published
  19. Published
  20. E-pub ahead of print
  21. Published
    Waddington, L. (2018). The influence of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on EU Non-Discrimination Law. In U. Belavusau, & K. Henrard (Eds.), EU anti-discrimination law beyond gender (pp. 339-361). Oxford/London/New York/New Delhi/Sydney: Hart Publishing.
  22. Published
    Mulder, C., & Müller, M. (2018). The procedural rules in appeal proceedings before the European Patent Office. In C. Geiger, C. A. Nard, & X. Seuba (Eds.), Intellectual property and the judiciary (pp. 289-307). (European Intellectual Property Institutes Network series). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  23. Published
    Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat (UN/DESA), Kamperman Sanders, A., Falcão, T., Haider, A., Jambeck, J., LaPointe, C., ... Ziebarth, N. (2018). World Economic and Social Survey 2018: Frontier Technologies for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations.
  24. Published
  25. Published
    Kamperman Sanders, A., Moerland, A., & Heath, C. (Eds.) (2018). Intellectual Property Rights as Obstacles to Legitimate Trade? (IEEM Series on International Intellectual Property Law; Vol. 9). Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer International.
  26. Published
  27. Published
    Kamperman Sanders, A. (2018). Unjustified threats and the repression of unfair competition. In A. Kamperman Sanders, C. Heath, & A. Moerland (Eds.), Intellectual property rights as obstacles to legitimate trade? (Vol. 9, pp. 181-203). (IEEM Series on International Intellectual Property Law; Vol. 9). Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
  28. Published
  29. Published
  30. Published
  31. Published
  32. Published
    Kamperman Sanders, A. (2018). 知识产权法和政策与经济发展——以中国为特定研究对象. In T. He, & Q. Xie (Eds.), 何天翔、谢晴川主編: 中國知識產權法:中國特色知識產權新探索 (pp. 274-314). Beijing: The Encyclopedia of China Publishing House.
  33. Published
  34. Published
  35. Published
  36. Published
  37. Published
  38. Published
  39. Published
  40. Published
  41. Published
  42. Published
  43. Published
  44. Published
    Waddington, L. (2018). Australia. In L. Waddington, & A. Lawson (Eds.), The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Practice: A comparative analysis of the role of courts (pp. 51-88). (International Law in Domestic Legal Orders). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  45. Published
    Lawson, A., & Waddington, L. (2018). Interpreting the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in domestic courts. In L. Waddington, & A. Lawson (Eds.), The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Practice: A comparative analysis of the role of courts (pp. 466-537). (International Law in Domestic Legal Orders). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  46. Published
    Lawson, A., & Waddington, L. (2018). Setting the Scene. In L. Waddington, & A. Lawson (Eds.), The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Practice: A comparative analysis of the role of court (pp. 1-12). (International Laws in Domestic Legal Orders). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  47. Published
    Waddington, L. (2018). The domestication of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Domestic legal status of the CRPD and relevance for court judgments. In L. Waddington, & A. Lawson (Eds.), The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Practice: A comparative analysis of the role of courts (pp. 538-555). (International Law in Domestic Legal Orders). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  48. Published
    Waddington, L. (2018). The European Union. In L. Waddington, & A. Lawson (Eds.), The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Practice: A comparative analysis of the role of courts (pp. 131-152). (International Law in Domestic Legal Orders). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  49. Published
    Waddington, L. (2018). The role of the judiciary and its relationship to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. In L. Waddington, & A. Lawson (Eds.), The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Practice: A comparative analysis of the role of courts (pp. 576-593). (International Law in Domestic Legal Orders). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  50. Published
    Waddington, L., & Lawson, A. (Eds.) (2018). The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Practice: A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Courts. (International Law in Domestic Legal Orders). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198786627.001.0001
  51. Published
  52. Published
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...47 Next