Modern insurgency warfare's incompatibility with the principle of distinction

Research output: ThesisDoctoral ThesisInternal

Abstract

This research studies how the principle of distinction, as codified in International Humanitarian Law (IHL), is incompatible with modern insurgency warfare. This study contrasts the evolution of IHL with modern insurgencies, commonly referred to as new wars, and evaluates this concept of insurgency warfare. It identifies the critical characteristics of modern insurgencies and analyses if these meet the requirements established in IHL. Taking into consideration the above, it argues that current IHL is narrow in scope to regulate modern insurgency warfare, establishes unattainable thresholds for its application, therefore becoming inapplicable to insurgency warfare as intended. This results in lengthy insurgency wars, and directly increases civilian casualties in combat. Finally, this research establishes recommendations for the amendment and/or development of new guidelines in order to regulate this common type of warfare, and reduce its deadly impact on the civilian population.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution
  • Maastricht University
Supervisors/Advisors
  • Vidmar, Jure, Supervisor
  • Nunes Chaib, André, Co-Supervisor
Award date16 Apr 2024
Place of PublicationMaastricht
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Insurgency
  • Distinction
  • Humanitarian
  • Conflict

Cite this