RETRACTED: Composite reliability of workplace-based assessment for international medical graduates

B.R. Nair; J.M.W. Moonen-van Loon; M.S. Parvathy; C.P.M. van der Veuten

doi:10.5694/mja16.00069

RETRACTED: Composite reliability of workplace-based assessment for international medical graduates

B.R. Nair^*, J.M.W. Moonen-van Loon, M.S. Parvathy, C.P.M. van der Veuten

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Erratum / corrigendum / retractions › Academic

Abstract

The known Workplace-based assessment (WBA) of the performance of doctors has gained increasing attention. The reliability of individual assessment tools has been reported in previous studies.The new We analysed the composite reliability of a toolbox of WBA instruments In assessing international medical graduates (IMGs). For five case-based discussions, 12 Mini-Clinical Examination Exercises and six multisource feedback assessments, the composite reliability coefficient was 0.899 (standard error of measurement, 0.125).The implications The reliability of WBA for assessing the performance of IMGs is excellent. WBA can also be used for performance assessment in other settings.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	212-216
Number of pages	5
Journal	Medical Journal of Australia
Volume	205
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5694/mja16.00069
Publication status	Published - 5 Sept 2016

Keywords

COMPETENCE
PERFORMANCE
PROGRAMS
DOCTORS
GAP

Access to Document

10.5694/mja16.00069

Cite this

@article{e68f5f9e72dc477cb3ec341a470d25d7,

title = "RETRACTED: Composite reliability of workplace-based assessment for international medical graduates",

abstract = "The known Workplace-based assessment (WBA) of the performance of doctors has gained increasing attention. The reliability of individual assessment tools has been reported in previous studies.The new We analysed the composite reliability of a toolbox of WBA instruments In assessing international medical graduates (IMGs). For five case-based discussions, 12 Mini-Clinical Examination Exercises and six multisource feedback assessments, the composite reliability coefficient was 0.899 (standard error of measurement, 0.125).The implications The reliability of WBA for assessing the performance of IMGs is excellent. WBA can also be used for performance assessment in other settings.",

keywords = "COMPETENCE, PERFORMANCE, PROGRAMS, DOCTORS, GAP",

author = "B.R. Nair and {Moonen-van Loon}, J.M.W. and M.S. Parvathy and {van der Veuten}, C.P.M.",

year = "2016",

month = sep,

day = "5",

doi = "10.5694/mja16.00069",

language = "English",

volume = "205",

pages = "212--216",

journal = "Medical Journal of Australia",

issn = "0025-729X",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - RETRACTED: Composite reliability of workplace-based assessment for international medical graduates

AU - Nair, B.R.

AU - Moonen-van Loon, J.M.W.

AU - Parvathy, M.S.

AU - van der Veuten, C.P.M.

PY - 2016/9/5

Y1 - 2016/9/5

N2 - The known Workplace-based assessment (WBA) of the performance of doctors has gained increasing attention. The reliability of individual assessment tools has been reported in previous studies.The new We analysed the composite reliability of a toolbox of WBA instruments In assessing international medical graduates (IMGs). For five case-based discussions, 12 Mini-Clinical Examination Exercises and six multisource feedback assessments, the composite reliability coefficient was 0.899 (standard error of measurement, 0.125).The implications The reliability of WBA for assessing the performance of IMGs is excellent. WBA can also be used for performance assessment in other settings.

AB - The known Workplace-based assessment (WBA) of the performance of doctors has gained increasing attention. The reliability of individual assessment tools has been reported in previous studies.The new We analysed the composite reliability of a toolbox of WBA instruments In assessing international medical graduates (IMGs). For five case-based discussions, 12 Mini-Clinical Examination Exercises and six multisource feedback assessments, the composite reliability coefficient was 0.899 (standard error of measurement, 0.125).The implications The reliability of WBA for assessing the performance of IMGs is excellent. WBA can also be used for performance assessment in other settings.

KW - COMPETENCE

KW - PERFORMANCE

KW - PROGRAMS

KW - DOCTORS

KW - GAP

U2 - 10.5694/mja16.00069

DO - 10.5694/mja16.00069

M3 - Erratum / corrigendum / retractions

SN - 0025-729X

VL - 205

SP - 212

EP - 216

JO - Medical Journal of Australia

JF - Medical Journal of Australia

IS - 5

ER -