Urban water sector performance in Africa: A step-wise bias-corrected efficiency and effectiveness analysis

Dorcas Mbuvi*, Kristof De Witte, Sergio Perelman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

52 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Productivity analyses focus on either efficiency or effectiveness. This paper provides a step-wise approach for evaluating utility performance. In a first step, utilities’ technical efficiency is estimated. In a second step, we examine utilities’ effectiveness in meeting existing customer demands for drinking water services within their licensed jurisdiction. The difference between inefficiency and ineffectiveness is decomposed in a third step. A final step explores country-specific (e.g., income per capita), sector specific (e.g., regulation) and utility-specific (e.g., density economies) inefficiency and ineffectiveness determinants. The four steps are applied to the african drinking water utilities. The results indicate that the utilities face technical inefficiency rather than ineffectiveness challenges. This is consistent across the various african regions. Economic development is positively and significantly associated with increased technical efficiency and effectiveness levels.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-40
JournalUtilities Policy
Volume22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2012

Keywords

  • Benchmarking
  • Effectiveness
  • Efficiency
  • Double bootstrap
  • Urban water supply
  • Africa

Cite this