Non-invasive imaging prediction of tumor hypoxia: A novel developed and externally validated CT and FDG-PET-based radiomic signatures

Sebastian Sanduleanu*, Arthur Jochems, Taman Upadhaya, Aniek J. G. Even, Ralph T. H. Leijenaar, Frank J. W. M. Dankers, Remy Klaassen, Henry C. Woodruff, Mathieu Hatt, Hans J. A. M. Kaanders, Olga Hamming-Vrieze, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven, Rathan M. Subramiam, Shao Hui Huang, Brian O'Sullivan, Scott Bratman, Ludwig J. Dubois, Razvan L. Miclea, Dario Di Perri, Xavier GeetsMireia Crispin-Ortuzar, Aditya Apte, Joseph O. Deasy, Jung Hun Oh, Nancy Y. Lee, John L. Humm, Heiko Schoder, Dirk De Ruysscher, Frank Hoebers, Philippe Lambin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Tumor hypoxia increases resistance to radiotherapy and systemic therapy. Our aim was to develop and validate a disease-agnostic and disease-specific CT (+FDG-PET) based radiomics hypoxia classification signature.

Material and methods: A total of 808 patients with imaging data were included: N = 100 training/N = 183 external validation cases for a disease-agnostic CT hypoxia classification signature, N = 76 training/N = 39 validation cases for the H&N CT signature and N = 62 training/N = 36 validation cases for the Lung CT signature. The primary gross tumor volumes (GTV) were manually defined by experts on CT. In order to dichotomize between hypoxic/well-oxygenated tumors a threshold of 20% was used for the [F-18]-HX4-derived hypoxic fractions (HF). A random forest (RF)-based machine-learning classifier/regressor was trained to classify patients as hypoxia-positive/negative based on radiomic features.

Results: A 11 feature "disease-agnostic CT model" reached AUC's of respectively 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.94), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.67-0.96) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.67-0.89) in three external validation datasets. A "disease-agnostic FDG-PET model" reached an AUC of 0.73 (0.95% CI, 0.49-0.97) in validation by combining 5 features. The highest "lung-specific CT model" reached an AUC of 0.80 (0.95% CI, 0.65-0.95) in validation with 4 CT features, while the "H&N-specific CT model" reached an AUC of 0.84 (0.95% CI, 0.64-1.00) in validation with 15 CT features. A tumor volume-alone model was unable to significantly classify patients as hypoxia-positive/negative. A significant survival split (P = 0.037) was found between CT-classified hypoxia strata in an external H&N cohort (n = 517), while 117 significant hypoxia gene-CT signature feature associations were found in an external lung cohort (n = 80).

Conclusion: The disease-specific radiomics signatures perform better than the disease agnostic ones. By identifying hypoxic patients our signatures have the potential to enrich interventional hypoxia-targeting trials. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-105
Number of pages9
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume153
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

Keywords

  • Radiomics
  • Tumor hypoxia
  • UPTAKE DISTRIBUTIONS
  • CANCER PATIENTS
  • LUNG-TUMORS
  • RADIOTHERAPY
  • HEAD
  • DISCRETIZATION
  • REPEATABILITY
  • ANGIOGENESIS
  • METHODOLOGY
  • INFORMATION

Cite this