Knowledge syntheses in medical education: A bibliometric analysis

Lauren A. Maggio*, Joseph A. Costello, Candace Norton, Erik W. Driessen, Anthony R. Artino Jr

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review article peer-review

12 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Purpose This bibliometric analysis maps the landscape of knowledge syntheses in medical education. It provides scholars with a roadmap for understanding where the field has been and where it might go in the future, thereby informing research and educational practice. In particular, this analysis details the venues in which knowledge syntheses are published, the types of syntheses conducted, citation rates they produce, and altmetric attention they garner.

Method In 2020, the authors conducted a bibliometric analysis of knowledge syntheses published in 14 core medical education journals from 1999 to 2019. To characterize the studies, metadata were extracted from PubMed, Web of Science, Altmetrics Explorer, and Unpaywall.

Results The authors analyzed 963 knowledge syntheses representing 3.1% of the total articles published (n= 30,597). On average, 45.9 knowledge syntheses were published annually (SD= 35.85, median= 33), and there was an overall 2620% increase in the number of knowledge syntheses published from 1999 to 2019. The journals each published, on average, a total of 68.8 knowledge syntheses (SD= 67.2, median= 41) with Medical Education publishing the most (n= 189; 19%). Twenty-one types of knowledge synthesis were identified, the most prevalent being systematic reviews (n= 341; 35.4%) and scoping reviews (n= 88; 9.1%). Knowledge syntheses were cited an average of 53.80 times (SD= 107.12, median= 19) and received a mean Altmetric Attention Score of 14.12 (SD= 37.59, median= 6).

Conclusions There has been considerable growth in knowledge syntheses in medical education over the past 20 years, contributing to medical education's evidence base. Beyond this increase in volume, researchers have introduced methodological diversity in these publications, and the community has taken to social media to share knowledge syntheses. Implications for the field, including the impact of synthesis types and their relationship to knowledge translation, are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-87
Number of pages9
JournalPerspectives on Medical Education
Volume10
Issue number2
Early online date22 Oct 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021

Keywords

  • HEALTH-PROFESSIONS EDUCATION
  • Knowledge synthesis
  • Publishing
  • REVIEWS
  • Review
  • STANDARDS
  • Scholarly communication
  • SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS

Cite this