Abstract
Multidisciplinary teams are often employed to solve complex problems, but research has shown that using such teams does not guarantee arriving at good solutions. Good team-solutions require team members possessing a good degree of common ground. In this contribution an ICT-tool based upon making individual perspectives explicit to other team members is studied. Two versions of the tool that differed in the extent to which users were coerced to adhere to embedded support principles were used, in both a laboratory and a secondary professional education setting. Coercion, as expected, increased negotiation of common ground in both settings. However, results were contradictory with regard the amount of common ground achieved. Overall, it can be concluded that NTool and its underlying framework affect negotiation of common ground, and that adding some coercion increases this effect. However, one should be careful with the specific task and audience before implementing NTool.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years! |
Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005 |
Editors | Timothy Koschmann |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
Chapter | 2 |
Pages | 8-17 |
Number of pages | 10 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781351226899 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780805857825 |
Publication status | Published - 3 Oct 2017 |
Keywords
- Coercion
- Common ground
- ICT-tools
- Knowledge construction
- Negotiation of meaning