TY - JOUR
T1 - Victims’ Right to Justice, Immunities and New Avenues for International Criminal Justice
AU - Galand, Alexandre Skander
N1 - Funding Information:
The research leading to the publication of this article was conducted while the author was a postdoctoral fellow at the Centre for Fundamental Rights, Hertie School, Germany. The author would like to thank the reviewers, Claus Kress and Anni Pues for their comments on earlier drafts of this article, which was presented at the Fundamental Rights Research Colloqium, Hertie School.
Publisher Copyright:
© Alexandre Skander Galand, 2022.
PY - 2023/4/11
Y1 - 2023/4/11
N2 - On account of the immunities which foreign State officials enjoy under international law, universal jurisdiction trials fail to offer justice to victims of crimes orchestrated by State authorities. The ICC Appeals Chamber has affirmed that immunities are inapplicable before international courts as no customary rule providing immunities before international courts has taken shape. While plausible, a critical assessment should still be made of which features an international court should have to be genuinely distinguishable from domestic courts, and thereby not be concerned with immunities. In this paper, it is argued that, unlike domestic courts, certain international criminal courts may be expressly endorsed by the international community as organs which may restore peaceful relations between and among states – the very rationale underlying personal immunity – and, as such, provide victims with access to justice.
AB - On account of the immunities which foreign State officials enjoy under international law, universal jurisdiction trials fail to offer justice to victims of crimes orchestrated by State authorities. The ICC Appeals Chamber has affirmed that immunities are inapplicable before international courts as no customary rule providing immunities before international courts has taken shape. While plausible, a critical assessment should still be made of which features an international court should have to be genuinely distinguishable from domestic courts, and thereby not be concerned with immunities. In this paper, it is argued that, unlike domestic courts, certain international criminal courts may be expressly endorsed by the international community as organs which may restore peaceful relations between and among states – the very rationale underlying personal immunity – and, as such, provide victims with access to justice.
KW - victim’s right to justice
KW - immunities of State officials
KW - international criminal courts
KW - universal jurisdiction
KW - general assembly
U2 - 10.1163/18719732-bja10085
DO - 10.1163/18719732-bja10085
M3 - Article
SN - 1871-9740
VL - 25
SP - 184
EP - 212
JO - International Community Law Review
JF - International Community Law Review
IS - 2
ER -