Value-based healthcare implementation in the Netherlands: a quantitative analysis of multidisciplinary team performance

BACKGROUND: Many hospitals worldwide have set up multidisciplinary Value Improvement (VI) teams that use the Value-Based Health Care (VBHC) theory to improve patient value. However, it remains unclear what the level of VBHC implementation is within these teams. We therefore studied the current level of VBHC implementation in VI teams. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed based on the strategic agenda for value transformation and real-world experiences with VBHC implementation. The questionnaire consisted of 21 questions, mapped to seven domains, and was sent out to 25 multidisciplinary VI teams. Median scores for individual questions (scale?=?1-5) and average scores per domain were calculated. RESULTS: One hundred forty VI team members completed the questionnaire. The overall average score is 3.49. The 'culture and responsibility' domain obtained the highest average score (µ?=?4.11). The domain 'measure and improve outcomes' and the domain 'multidisciplinary team' obtained average scores that are slightly higher than the overall average (µ?=?3.78 and µ?=?3.76 respectively), and the domains 'strategy and organizational policy,' 'collaboration and sharing,' and 'IT and data' scored a little below the overall average (µ?=?3.41, µ?=?3.32, and µ?=?3.29 respectively). The domain 'costs and reimbursement' obtained the lowest average score (µ?=?2.42) of all domains, indicating that the implementation of this particular aspect of VBHC remains lagging behind. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate activity in each of the questionnaire domains. To bring VBHC implementation to the next level, more attention should be given to the financial aspects. Our questionnaire can be used in future studies to identify improvements or differences within VI teams.