Abstract
This study reports reliability and validity of the Dutch Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ). In total, 845 participants completed the RPQ along with other measures of aggression. Groups consisted of non-offender participants, criminal offenders, youngsters (age 618), and adults (age above 18). Testretest stability in a subsample of 324 childhood arrestees was good (all ICC's>0.41). A confirmatory factor analysis supported the same two-factor structure as in the original RPQ. Convergent validity was adequate (all r's>0.16). Moreover, results demonstrated that the proactive and reactive subscales were differentially related to measurements of callousness and impulsiveness, respectively. Criterion validity was shown in that non-offender subjects demonstrated significantly lower RPQ scores than offender samples. Finally, construct validity was demonstrated in that violent offenders showed higher aggression scores than non-violent offenders. Proactive aggression showed different developmental trajectories within non-offender versus criminal samples, indicating that this form of aggression may be more pathological. Aggr. Behav. 39:99113, 2013. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 99-113 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Aggressive Behavior |
Volume | 39 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2013 |
Keywords
- reactive aggression
- proactive aggression
- impulsivity
- predatory
- CALLOUS-UNEMOTIONAL TRAITS
- PSYCHOPATHIC PERSONALITY-INVENTORY
- BARRATT IMPULSIVENESS SCALE
- CONDUCT PROBLEMS
- DEVELOPMENTAL TRAJECTORIES
- PREMEDITATED AGGRESSION
- CLINICAL-ASSESSMENT
- 2-FACTOR MODEL
- SELF-REPORT
- ADOLESCENCE