Use of leadless pacemakers in Europe: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey

Serge Boveda, Radoslaw Lenarczyk, Kristina H. Haugaa, Konstantinos Iliodromitis, Malcolm Finlay, Deirdre Lane, FritsW. Prinzen, Nikolaos Dagres

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey is to provide an overview of the current use of leadless pacemakers (LLPM) across a broad range of European centres. An online questionnaire was sent to centres participating in the EHRA Electrophysiology Research Network. Questions dealt with standards of care and policies used for patient management, indications, and techniques of implantation of LLPM. In total, 52 centres participated in the survey. Most (86%) reported using LLPM, although 82% of these centres implanted < 30 LLPM devices during the last 12 months. Non-availability (36%), lack of reimbursement (55%), and cost of the device (91%) were factors limiting the use of LLPM. The most commonly reported indications for LLPM were permanent atrial fibrillation (83%), a history of complicated conventional pacemaker (87%), or an anticipated difficult vascular access (91%). Implantation of LLPM is perceived as an easy-to-do and safe procedure by most implanters (64%), while difficult or risky in 28%, and comparable to conventional pacemakers by only a few (8%). Local vascular complications were the most frequently reported major problems (28%), but a significant number of respondents (36%) have never encountered any issue after LLPM implantation. Although cost and reimbursement issues strongly influence the use of LLPM, most respondents (72%) anticipate a significant increase in device utilization within next 2 years.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)555-559
Number of pages5
JournalEP Europace
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018

Keywords

  • Leadless pacemakers
  • Standards of care
  • European Heart Rhythm Association survey
  • EP Wire
  • CARDIAC-PACEMAKER
  • CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR
  • IMPLANTATION
  • THERAPY
  • LEADS
  • COMPLICATIONS
  • PERFORMANCE
  • PREDICTORS

Cite this

Boveda, S., Lenarczyk, R., Haugaa, K. H., Iliodromitis, K., Finlay, M., Lane, D., Prinzen, F., & Dagres, N. (2018). Use of leadless pacemakers in Europe: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey. EP Europace, 20(3), 555-559. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eux381