Treatment results for severe psychiatric illness: which method is best suited to denote the outcome of mental health care?

Edwin de Beurs, Matthijs Blankers, Philippe Delespaul, Erik van Duijn, Niels Mulder, Annet Nugter, Wilma Swildens, Bea G. Tiemens, Jan Theunissen, Arno F. A. van Voorst, Jaap van Weeghel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Article number225
Number of pages10
JournalBMC Psychiatry
Volume18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Jul 2018

Keywords

  • Clinical significance
  • HoNOS
  • Routine outcome monitoring
  • Severe mental illness
  • Treatment outcome
  • CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT CHANGE
  • RELIABLE CHANGE
  • SCALES HONOS
  • PSYCHOTHERAPY
  • RELIABILITY
  • MANAGEMENT
  • SERVICES
  • VALIDITY

Cite this

de Beurs, E., Blankers, M., Delespaul, P., van Duijn, E., Mulder, N., Nugter, A., Swildens, W., Tiemens, B. G., Theunissen, J., van Voorst, A. F. A., & van Weeghel, J. (2018). Treatment results for severe psychiatric illness: which method is best suited to denote the outcome of mental health care? BMC Psychiatry, 18, [225]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1798-4