TY - JOUR
T1 - Traditional lifestyle factors partly mediate the association of socioeconomic position with intrahepatic lipid content
T2 - The Maastricht study
AU - Ren, Zhewen
AU - Bosma, Hans
AU - Wesselius, Anke
AU - Eussen, Simone J.P.M.
AU - Kooi, M. Eline
AU - van der Kallen, Carla J.H.
AU - Koster, Annemarie
AU - van Greevenbroek, Marleen M.J.
AU - Dagnelie, Pieter
AU - Stehouwer, Coen D.A.
AU - Brouwers, Martijn C.G.J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/11/1
Y1 - 2023/11/1
N2 - Background & Aims: Recent studies have unveiled an association between socioeconomic position (SEP) and intrahepatic lipid (IHL) content. The aim of this study was to examine to what extent traditional lifestyle factors mediate the relationship between SEP and IHL content, independent of aetiology, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Methods: We used cross-sectional data derived from The Maastricht Study (N = 4,001; mean age: 60 years, 49% women, 32% low education level, 21% diabetes, 21% NAFLD). Education, income, and occupation were used as indicators of SEP. Physical activity (accelerometer), intake of total energy, alcohol, saturated fat, protein, vitamin E, dietary fibre, and fructose from sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and fruit juice (food frequency questionnaires) were potential mediators. IHL content was quantified by magnetic resonance imaging. Age, sex, and type 2 diabetes were covariates. Multiple parallel mediation analyses (bootstraps = 10,000) were performed. Results: Individuals with a low education level had a 1.056-fold higher IHL content (95% CI: 1.03–1.08) and a 44% greater NAFLD risk (OR:1.44; 95% CI:1.18–1.77) compared with those with higher education levels. Approximately 8.9% of educational disparity in risk of IHL content was attributable to moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; 6.3% to fructose intake from SSBs; 5.5% to dietary fibre; and -23% to alcohol. Approximately 8.7% of educational disparity in risk of NAFLD was attributable to moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; and 7.7% to fructose intake from SSBs. However, the indirect effect of these mediators was small (0.998 for IHL content and 1.045 for NAFLD) in comparison to the total effect. Similar results were found when income and occupation were used as SEP indicators. Conclusions: Societal measures may alleviate the burden of NAFLD and further studies that identify mediators other than traditional lifestyle factors are warranted to define the relationship underlying SEP and IHL content. Impact and implications: Individuals with a low or medium level of education, income, or occupational status had more fat accumulation in their livers than individuals with a higher education, income, or occupational status. This difference may be attributed to the influence of unhealthy lifestyle factors, such as reduced physical activity and a higher intake of sugar-sweetened beverages among individuals with lower socioeconomic position. Nevertheless, other yet unknown factors may also play a role.
AB - Background & Aims: Recent studies have unveiled an association between socioeconomic position (SEP) and intrahepatic lipid (IHL) content. The aim of this study was to examine to what extent traditional lifestyle factors mediate the relationship between SEP and IHL content, independent of aetiology, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Methods: We used cross-sectional data derived from The Maastricht Study (N = 4,001; mean age: 60 years, 49% women, 32% low education level, 21% diabetes, 21% NAFLD). Education, income, and occupation were used as indicators of SEP. Physical activity (accelerometer), intake of total energy, alcohol, saturated fat, protein, vitamin E, dietary fibre, and fructose from sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and fruit juice (food frequency questionnaires) were potential mediators. IHL content was quantified by magnetic resonance imaging. Age, sex, and type 2 diabetes were covariates. Multiple parallel mediation analyses (bootstraps = 10,000) were performed. Results: Individuals with a low education level had a 1.056-fold higher IHL content (95% CI: 1.03–1.08) and a 44% greater NAFLD risk (OR:1.44; 95% CI:1.18–1.77) compared with those with higher education levels. Approximately 8.9% of educational disparity in risk of IHL content was attributable to moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; 6.3% to fructose intake from SSBs; 5.5% to dietary fibre; and -23% to alcohol. Approximately 8.7% of educational disparity in risk of NAFLD was attributable to moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; and 7.7% to fructose intake from SSBs. However, the indirect effect of these mediators was small (0.998 for IHL content and 1.045 for NAFLD) in comparison to the total effect. Similar results were found when income and occupation were used as SEP indicators. Conclusions: Societal measures may alleviate the burden of NAFLD and further studies that identify mediators other than traditional lifestyle factors are warranted to define the relationship underlying SEP and IHL content. Impact and implications: Individuals with a low or medium level of education, income, or occupational status had more fat accumulation in their livers than individuals with a higher education, income, or occupational status. This difference may be attributed to the influence of unhealthy lifestyle factors, such as reduced physical activity and a higher intake of sugar-sweetened beverages among individuals with lower socioeconomic position. Nevertheless, other yet unknown factors may also play a role.
KW - Intrahepatic lipid content
KW - Lifestyle
KW - Mediation analysis
KW - Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
KW - Socioeconomic
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100855
DO - 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100855
M3 - Article
SN - 2589-5559
VL - 5
JO - JHEP Reports
JF - JHEP Reports
IS - 11
M1 - 100855
ER -