Topical vancomycin for sternal wound infection prophylaxis. A systematic review and updated meta-analysis of over 40,000 cardiac surgery patients

Mariusz Kowalewski*, Michal Pasierski, Maged Makhoul, Maria Comanici, Emil Julian Dabrowski, Matteo Matteucci, Radoslaw Litwinowicz, Adam Kowalówka, Wojciech Wanha, Federica Jiritano, Dario Fina, Gennaro Martucci, Giuseppe Maria Raffa, Pietro Giorgio Malvindi, Lukasz Kuzma, Piotr Suwalski, Roberto Lorusso, Paolo Meani, Harold Lazar, Thoracic Research Centre

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review article peer-review

Abstract

Background: Despite guideline recommendations, routine application of topical antibiotic agents to sternal edges after cardiac surgery is seldom done. Recent randomized controlled trials have also questioned the effectiveness of topical vancomycin in sternal wound infection prophylaxis. Methods: We screened multiple databases for observational studies and randomized controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of topical vancomycin. Random effects meta-analysis and risk-profile regression were performed, and randomized controlled trials and observational studies were analyzed separately. The primary endpoint was sternal wound infection; other wound complications were also analyzed. Risk ratios served as primary statistics. Results: Twenty studies (N = 40,871) were included, of which 7 were randomized controlled trials (N = 2,187). The risk of sternal wound infection was significantly reduced by almost 70% in the topical vancomycin group (risk ratios [95% confidence intervals]: 0.31 (0.23–0.43); P < .00001) and was comparable between randomized controlled trials (0.37 [0.21–0.64]; P < .0001) and observational studies (0.30 [0.20–0.45]; P < .00001; Psubgroup = .57). Topical vancomycin significantly reduced the risk of superficial sternal wound infections (0.29 [0.15–0.53]; P < .00001) and deep sternal wound infections (0.29 [0.19–0.44]; P < .00001). A reduction in the risk of mediastinitis and sternal dehiscence risks was also demonstrated. Risk profile meta-regression showed a significant relationship between a higher risk of sternal wound infection and a higher benefit accrued with topical vancomycin (ß-coeff. = -0.00837; P < .0001). The number needed to treat was 58.2. A significant benefit was observed in patients with diabetes mellitus (risk ratios 0.21 [0.11–0.39]; P < .00001). There was no evidence of vancomycin or methicillin resistance; on the contrary, the risk of gram-negative cultures was reduced by over 60% (risk ratios 0.38 [0.22–0.66]; P = .0006). Conclusion: Topical vancomycin effectively reduces the risk of sternal wound infection in cardiac surgery patients.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1102-1112
Number of pages11
JournalSurgery
Volume174
Issue number5
Early online date1 Jan 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023

Cite this