The Validation of a Pocket Worn Activity Tracker for Step Count and Physical Behavior in Older Adults during Simulated Activities of Daily Living

Darcy Ummels*, Wouter Bijnens, Jos Aarts, Kenneth Meijer, Anna J. Beurskens, Emmylou Beekman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to validate optimized algorithm parameter settings for step count and physical behavior for a pocket worn activity tracker in older adults during ADL. Secondly, for a more relevant interpretation of the results, the performance of the optimized algorithm was compared to three reference applications

Methods: In a cross-sectional validation study, 20 older adults performed an activity protocol based on ADL with MOX(MissActivity)versus MOXAnnegarn, activPAL, and Fitbit. The protocol was video recorded and analyzed for step count and dynamic, standing, and sedentary time. Validity was assessed by percentage error (PE), absolute percentage error (APE), Bland-Altman plots and correlation coefficients.

Results: For step count, the optimized algorithm had a mean APE of 9.3% and a correlation coefficient of 0.88. The mean APE values of dynamic, standing, and sedentary time were 15.9%, 19.9%, and 9.6%, respectively. The correlation coefficients were 0.55, 0.91, and 0.92, respectively. Three reference applications showed higher errors and lower correlations for all outcome variables.

Conclusion: This study showed that the optimized algorithm parameter settings can more validly estimate step count and physical behavior in older adults wearing an activity tracker in the trouser pocket during ADL compared to reference applications.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2333721420951732
Number of pages11
JournalGerontology and geriatric medicine
Volume6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2020

Keywords

  • Wearable
  • step count
  • physical activity
  • validation
  • older adults
  • ADL
  • ACTIVITY MONITORS
  • PEDOMETER ACCURACY
  • VALIDITY

Cite this