TY - JOUR
T1 - The Politicisation of Evaluation
T2 - Constructing and Contesting EU Policy Performance
AU - Stephenson, Paul
AU - Schoenefeld, Jonas J.
AU - Leeuw, Frans
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank all the contributors for initially presenting their ideas at a?dedicated 2?day workshop in Brussels in January 2018 and then for staying with us until the completion of this special issue. We are grateful to the PVS editorial board for their trust in our special issue idea, and to Editor-in-Chief Prof. Dr. Mich?le Knodt, Managing Editor Katharina Kleinschnitger and Dr. Christian Adam for their encouragement and patience throughout the review and production process. The Brussels workshop was financed by funds raised by Paul Stephenson from the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Maastricht University, CERIM (Centre for European Research in Maastricht), and SWOL (Stichting Universiteitsfonds Limburg), and funds raised by Frans Leeuw from the Faculty of Law at Maastricht University. The authors are grateful to all four bodies whose financing made it possible to bring the authors of the special issue together. Jonas Schoenefeld would like to acknowledge support from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Reference: 03SFK4P0, Consortium ENavi, Kopernikus).
Funding Information:
We would like to thank all the contributors for initially presenting their ideas at a dedicated 2‑day workshop in Brussels in January 2018 and then for staying with us until the completion of this special issue. We are grateful to the PVS editorial board for their trust in our special issue idea, and to Editor-in-Chief Prof. Dr. Michèle Knodt, Managing Editor Katharina Kleinschnitger and Dr. Christian Adam for their encouragement and patience throughout the review and production process. The Brussels workshop was financed by funds raised by Paul Stephenson from the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Maastricht University, CERIM (Centre for European Research in Maastricht), and SWOL (Stichting Universiteitsfonds Limburg), and funds raised by Frans Leeuw from the Faculty of Law at Maastricht University. The authors are grateful to all four bodies whose financing made it possible to bring the authors of the special issue together. Jonas Schoenefeld would like to acknowledge support from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Reference: 03SFK4P0, Consortium ENavi, Kopernikus).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, The Author(s).
PY - 2019/12/16
Y1 - 2019/12/16
N2 - Although systematic policy evaluation has been conducted for decades and has been growing strongly within the European Union (EU) institutions and in the member states, it remains largely underexplored in political science literatures. Extant work in political science and public policy typically focuses on elements such as agenda setting, policy shaping, decision making, or implementation rather than evaluation. Although individual pieces of research on evaluation in the EU have started to emerge, most often regarding policy “effectiveness” (one criterion among many in evaluation), a more structured approach is currently missing. This special issue aims to address this gap in political science by focusing on four key focal points: evaluation institutions (including rules and cultures), evaluation actors and interests (including competencies, power, roles and tasks), evaluation design (including research methods and theories, and their impact on policy design and legislation), and finally, evaluation purpose and use (including the relationships between discourse and scientific evidence, political attitudes and strategic use). The special issue considers how each of these elements contributes to an evolving governance system in the EU, where evaluation is playing an increasingly important role in decision making.
AB - Although systematic policy evaluation has been conducted for decades and has been growing strongly within the European Union (EU) institutions and in the member states, it remains largely underexplored in political science literatures. Extant work in political science and public policy typically focuses on elements such as agenda setting, policy shaping, decision making, or implementation rather than evaluation. Although individual pieces of research on evaluation in the EU have started to emerge, most often regarding policy “effectiveness” (one criterion among many in evaluation), a more structured approach is currently missing. This special issue aims to address this gap in political science by focusing on four key focal points: evaluation institutions (including rules and cultures), evaluation actors and interests (including competencies, power, roles and tasks), evaluation design (including research methods and theories, and their impact on policy design and legislation), and finally, evaluation purpose and use (including the relationships between discourse and scientific evidence, political attitudes and strategic use). The special issue considers how each of these elements contributes to an evolving governance system in the EU, where evaluation is playing an increasingly important role in decision making.
KW - EU Institutions
KW - Performance
KW - Contestation
KW - Learning
KW - Evaluation use
KW - EVALUATION SYSTEMS
KW - ACCOUNTABILITY
KW - COMMISSION
UR - https://link.springer.com/journal/11615/volumes-and-issues/60-4
U2 - 10.1007/s11615-019-00212-7
DO - 10.1007/s11615-019-00212-7
M3 - Article
SN - 0032-3470
VL - 60
SP - 663
EP - 679
JO - Politische Vierteljahresschrift
JF - Politische Vierteljahresschrift
IS - 4
ER -