Abstract
We show that the invariant method [pinski & narin, 1976], recently axiomatised by palacios-huerta & volij [2004], and used to quality-rank academic journals is subject to manipulation: a journal can boost its performance by making additional citations to other journals.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 291-293 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Scientometrics |
Volume | 81 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2009 |