The indirect review of administrative action in search of a fair balance between legality and legal certainty

Mariolina Eliantonio, Dacian Dragos

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

Abstract

In this introductory chapter, we present the aim and structure of the edited collection as well as its main findings. We first sketch the scope and rationale of the system of indirect judicial review, then we move to examine the bodies which can indirectly review the administrative action as well as (procedural) workings of the mechanism. Subsequently, we try to provide some insights into the concrete operation and current use of the system of indirect review. We finally move to discussing the notion of indirect review of administrative action as a tool to balance legality and legal certainty and draw some conclusions on the existence of a ‘common core’ in Europe when it comes to the system of indirect review of administrative action.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIndirect Judicial Review in Administrative Law: Legality vs Legal Certainty In Europe
EditorsMariolina Eliantonio, Dacian Dragos
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Pages1-12
Number of pages12
ISBN (Electronic)9781003164302, 9780367758622
ISBN (Print)9780367758578
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Nov 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The indirect review of administrative action in search of a fair balance between legality and legal certainty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this