The impact of PRODIGE 7 on the current worldwide practice of CRS-HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A web-based survey and 2021 statement by Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI)

V.C.J. van de Vlasakker, R.J. Lurvink, P.H. Cashin, W. Ceelen, M. Deraco, D. Goere, S. Gonzalez-Moreno, K. Lehmann, Y. Li, B. Moran, D.L. Morris, P. Piso, C.A. Quadros, B. Rau, S.P. Somashekhar, A. Sommariva, K. van der Speeten, J. Spiliotis, P.H. Sugarbaker, M.C.C. TeoV.J. Verwaal, Y. Yonemura, O. Glehen, I.H.J.T. de Hingh*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: The PRODIGE 7-trial investigated the additional value of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM). The results of PRODIGE 7 were presented at the 2018 ASCO meeting showing that 30 min oxaliplatin-based HIPEC did not improve overall survival. The current study investigated the impact of PRODIGE 7 on the worldwide practice of CRS and HIPEC. Materials and methods: CRS-HIPEC experts from 19 countries were invited through the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) to complete an online survey concerning the current CRS-HIPEC practice in their hospital and country, and were asked to appraise the effect of PRODIGE 7. Results: The survey was completed by 18/19 experts. Although their personal opinions of CRS-HIPEC were barely influenced by PRODIGE 7, they reported a substantial impact on daily practice. This included a switch towards Mitomycin-C based HIPEC-regimens and prolongation of HIPEC perfusion time, a reduction in the number of referrals from non-HIPEC centers, a reduction in national consensus, the removal of HIPEC from national guidelines, and a reduced reimbursement rate. Conclusion: The PRODIGE 7 has had a major impact on the practice of CRS-HIPEC for CPM worldwide. HIPEC remains an attractive option with potential for control and eradication of disease and further studies into the optimal HIPEC-regimen are urgently needed. Meanwhile, given the complexity of the treatment of patients with CPM, and the proven benefits of optimal CRS, referral of patients with potentially resectable CPM to expert centers is recommended whilst the precise role of HIPEC is further evaluated. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2888-2892
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume47
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2021

Keywords

  • CRS-HIPEC
  • HIPEC
  • Colorectal peritoneal metastases
  • PRODIGE 7
  • CYTOREDUCTION

Cite this