The evolving state of cardiac resynchronization therapy and conduction system pacing: 25 years of research at EP Europace journal

Kenneth A. Ellenbogen*, Angelo Auricchio, Haran Burri, Michael R. Gold, Christophe Leclercq, Francisco Leyva, Cecilia Linde, Marek Jastrzebski, Frits Prinzen, Kevin Vernooy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review article peer-review

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was proposed in the 1990s as a new therapy for patients with heart failure and wide QRS with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction despite optimal medical treatment. This review is aimed first to describe the rationale and the physiologic effects of CRT. The journey of the landmark randomized trials leading to the adoption of CRT in the guidelines since 2005 is also reported showing the high level of evidence for CRT. Different alternative pacing modalities of CRT to conventional left ventricular pacing through the coronary sinus have been proposed to increase the response rate to CRT such as multisite pacing and endocardial pacing. A new emerging alternative technique to conventional biventricular pacing, conduction system pacing (CSP), is a promising therapy. The different modalities of CSP are described (Hirs pacing and left bundle branch area pacing). This new technique has to be evaluated in clinical randomized trials before implementation in the guidelines with a high level of evidence.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbereuad168
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalEP Europace
Volume25
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Aug 2023

Keywords

  • Cardiac conduction system pacing
  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • Clinical trials

Cite this