Abstract
In order to study early human development while avoiding the burdens associated with human embryo research, scientists are redirecting their efforts towards so-called human embryo-like structures (hELS). hELS are created from clusters of human pluripotent stem cells and seem capable of mimicking early human development with increasing accuracy. Notwithstanding, hELS research finds itself at the intersection of historically controversial fields, and the expectation that it might be received as similarly sensitive is prompting proactive law reform in many jurisdictions, including the Netherlands. However, studies on the public perception of hELS research remain scarce. To help guide policymakers and fill this gap in the literature, we conducted an explorative qualitative study aimed at mapping the range of perspectives in the Netherlands on the creation and research use of hELS. This article reports on a subset of our findings, namely those pertaining to (the degrees of and requirements for) confidence in research with hELS and its regulation. Despite commonly found disparities in confidence on emerging biotechnologies, we also found wide consensus regarding the requirements for having (more) confidence in hELS research. We conclude by reflecting on how these findings could be relevant to researchers and (Dutch) policymakers when interpreted within the context of their limitations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 30 |
Journal | Journal of Bioethical Inquiry |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 1 Mar 2024 |
Keywords
- Focus group study
- Lay perspectives
- Professional perspectives
- Ethics
- Policy
- Human embryo-like structures
- SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
- PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS
- PLAYING GOD
- PERSPECTIVES
- POLICY
- POTENTIALITY
- ARGUMENT
- SCIENCE
- MODELS
- ISSUES