The endometrial transcriptome of infertile women with and without implantation failure

Bich Ngoc Bui*, Viktorija Kukushkina, Alvin Meltsov, Catharina Olsen, Nienke van Hoogenhuijze, Signe Altmaee, Femke Mol, Gijs Teklenburg, Jan-Peter de Bruin, Dagmar Besselink, Linda Stevens Brentjens, Darina Obukhova, Masoud Zamani Esteki, Ron van Golde, Andrea Romano, Triin Laisk, Gaby Steba, Shari Mackens, Andres Salumets, Frank Broekmans

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Implantation failure after transferring morphologically “good-quality” embryos in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) may be explained by impaired endometrial receptivity. Analyzing the endometrial transcriptome analysis may reveal the underlying processes and could help in guiding prognosis and using targeted interventions for infertility. This exploratory study investigated whether the endometrial transcriptome profile was associated with short-term or long-term implantation outcomes (ie success or failure). Material and methods: Mid-luteal phase endometrial biopsies of 107 infertile women with one full failed IVF/ICSI cycle, obtained within an endometrial scratching trial, were subjected to RNA-sequencing and differentially expressed genes analysis with covariate adjustment (age, body mass index, luteinizing hormone [LH]-day). Endometrial transcriptomes were compared between implantation failure and success groups in the short term (after the second fresh IVF/ICSI cycle) and long term (including all fresh and frozen cycles within 12 months). The short-term analysis included 85/107 women (33 ongoing pregnancy vs 52 no pregnancy), excluding 22/107 women. The long-term analysis included 46/107 women (23 ‘fertile’ group, ie infertile women with a live birth after ≤3 embryos transferred vs 23 recurrent implantation failure group, ie no live birth after ≥3 good quality embryos transferred), excluding 61/107 women not fitting these categories. As both analyses drew from the same pool of 107 samples, there was some sample overlap. Additionally, cell type enrichment scores and endometrial receptivity were analyzed, and an endometrial development pseudo-timeline was constructed to estimate transcriptomic deviations from the optimum receptivity day (LH + 7), denoted as ΔWOI (window of implantation). Results: There were no significantly differentially expressed genes between implantation failure and success groups in either the short-term or long-term analyses. Principal component analysis initially showed two clusters in the long-term analysis, unrelated to clinical phenotype and no longer distinct following covariate adjustment. Cell type enrichment scores did not differ significantly between groups in both analyses. However, endometrial receptivity analysis demonstrated a potentially significant displacement of the WOI in the non-pregnant group compared with the ongoing pregnant group in the short-term analysis. Conclusions: No distinct endometrial transcriptome profile was associated with either implantation failure or success in infertile women. However, there may be differences in the extent to which the WOI is displaced.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1348-1365
Number of pages18
JournalActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Volume103
Issue number7
Early online date1 Mar 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024

Keywords

  • assisted reproduction
  • endometrial receptivity
  • endometrium
  • gene expression
  • implantation failure
  • IVF/ICSI outcome
  • DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION ANALYSIS
  • EMBRYO IMPLANTATION
  • LIVE-BIRTH
  • RECEPTIVITY
  • IVF
  • FERTILITY
  • OUTCOMES
  • SMOKING
  • TIME
  • BLASTOCYST

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The endometrial transcriptome of infertile women with and without implantation failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this