Stress response to laparoscopic surgery: a review

M. Buunen, M. Gholghesaei, R. Veldkamp, D.W. Meijer, H.J. Bonjer*, N.D. Bouvy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


Stress response to laparoscopic surgery: a review.

Buunen M, Gholghesaei M, Veldkamp R, Meijer DW, Bonjer HJ, Bouvy ND.

Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery is associated with reduced surgical trauma, and therefore with a less acute phase response, as compared with open surgery. Impairment of the immune system may enhance surgical infections, port-site metastases, and sepsis. The objectives of this review was to assess immunologic consequences of benign laparoscopic surgery and to highlight controversial aspects. METHODS: A literature search on stress response to nonmalignant laparoscopic and open surgery was conducted using the MEDLINE and Cochrane databases. Cross-references from the reference list of major articles on the subject were used, as well as manuscripts published between 1993 and 2002. RESULTS: Local (i.e., peritoneal) immune function is affected by carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. The production of tumor necrosis factor and the phagocytotic capacity of peritoneal macrophages are less lowered. The systemic stress response, as determined by delayed-type hypersensitivity response and leukocyte antigen expression on lymphocytes, shows a preservation of immune function after laparoscopic surgery, as compared with conventional surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Intraperitoneal carbon dioxide insufflation attenuates peritoneal immunity, but laparoscopic surgery is associated with a lower systemic stress response than open surgery
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1022-1028
JournalSurgical endoscopy and other interventional techniques
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2004


Dive into the research topics of 'Stress response to laparoscopic surgery: a review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this