Sex offender management using the polygraph: a critical review.

E.H. Meijer, B. Verschuere, H.L.G.J. Merckelbach, G. Crombez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)
516 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Reducing recidivism is a central goal in the treatment of sex offenders. In Europe, there is an increased interest in using the polygraph ("lie detector") as a tool in the treatment and risk assessment of convicted sex offenders. This interest originated from optimistic reports by American clinicians who argued that polygraph testing in the treatment of sex offenders is akin to urine analysis in the treatment of drug addiction. In this article, we critically examine the validity and utility of post-conviction sex offender polygraph testing. Our review shows that the available evidence for the claims about the clinical potential of polygraph tests is weak, if not absent. We conclude that portraying post-conviction polygraph testing as analogous to urine analysis is inaccurate, misleading, and ultimately, risky.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)423-429
JournalInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2008

Cite this

@article{d549b82303314b5b88a01ee9238e557b,
title = "Sex offender management using the polygraph: a critical review.",
abstract = "Reducing recidivism is a central goal in the treatment of sex offenders. In Europe, there is an increased interest in using the polygraph ({"}lie detector{"}) as a tool in the treatment and risk assessment of convicted sex offenders. This interest originated from optimistic reports by American clinicians who argued that polygraph testing in the treatment of sex offenders is akin to urine analysis in the treatment of drug addiction. In this article, we critically examine the validity and utility of post-conviction sex offender polygraph testing. Our review shows that the available evidence for the claims about the clinical potential of polygraph tests is weak, if not absent. We conclude that portraying post-conviction polygraph testing as analogous to urine analysis is inaccurate, misleading, and ultimately, risky.",
author = "E.H. Meijer and B. Verschuere and H.L.G.J. Merckelbach and G. Crombez",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.08.007",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "423--429",
journal = "International Journal of Law and Psychiatry",
issn = "0160-2527",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "5",

}

Sex offender management using the polygraph: a critical review. / Meijer, E.H.; Verschuere, B.; Merckelbach, H.L.G.J.; Crombez, G.

In: International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, Vol. 31, No. 5, 01.01.2008, p. 423-429.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex offender management using the polygraph: a critical review.

AU - Meijer, E.H.

AU - Verschuere, B.

AU - Merckelbach, H.L.G.J.

AU - Crombez, G.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Reducing recidivism is a central goal in the treatment of sex offenders. In Europe, there is an increased interest in using the polygraph ("lie detector") as a tool in the treatment and risk assessment of convicted sex offenders. This interest originated from optimistic reports by American clinicians who argued that polygraph testing in the treatment of sex offenders is akin to urine analysis in the treatment of drug addiction. In this article, we critically examine the validity and utility of post-conviction sex offender polygraph testing. Our review shows that the available evidence for the claims about the clinical potential of polygraph tests is weak, if not absent. We conclude that portraying post-conviction polygraph testing as analogous to urine analysis is inaccurate, misleading, and ultimately, risky.

AB - Reducing recidivism is a central goal in the treatment of sex offenders. In Europe, there is an increased interest in using the polygraph ("lie detector") as a tool in the treatment and risk assessment of convicted sex offenders. This interest originated from optimistic reports by American clinicians who argued that polygraph testing in the treatment of sex offenders is akin to urine analysis in the treatment of drug addiction. In this article, we critically examine the validity and utility of post-conviction sex offender polygraph testing. Our review shows that the available evidence for the claims about the clinical potential of polygraph tests is weak, if not absent. We conclude that portraying post-conviction polygraph testing as analogous to urine analysis is inaccurate, misleading, and ultimately, risky.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.08.007

DO - 10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.08.007

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 423

EP - 429

JO - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

JF - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

SN - 0160-2527

IS - 5

ER -