Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

F. Mol; N.M. van Mello; A. Strandell; K. Strandell; D. Jurkovic; J. Ross; K.T. Barnhart; T.M. Yalcinkaya; H.R. Verhoeve; G.C.M. Graziosi; C.A.M. Koks; I. Klinte; L. Hogström; I.C.A.H. Janssen; H. Kragt; A. Hoek; T.C.M. Trimbos-Kemper; F.J.M. Broekmans; W.N.P. Willemsen; W.M. Ankum; B.W. Mol; M. van Wely; F. van der Veen; H. van Dessel; the European Surgery in Ectopic Pregnancy (ESEP) study group; P.J. Hajenius

doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60123-9

Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

F. Mol^*, N.M. van Mello, A. Strandell, K. Strandell, D. Jurkovic, J. Ross, K.T. Barnhart, T.M. Yalcinkaya, H.R. Verhoeve, G.C.M. Graziosi, C.A.M. Koks, I. Klinte, L. Hogström, I.C.A.H. Janssen, H. Kragt, A. Hoek, T.C.M. Trimbos-Kemper, F.J.M. Broekmans, W.N.P. Willemsen, W.M. AnkumB.W. Mol, M. van Wely, F. van der Veen, H. van Dessel, the European Surgery in Ectopic Pregnancy (ESEP) study group, P.J. Hajenius

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Background tubal ectopic pregnancy can be surgically treated by salpingectomy, in which the affected fallopian tube is removed, or salpingotomy, in which the tube is preserved. Despite potentially increased risks of persistent trophoblast and repeat ectopic pregnancy, salpingotomy is often preferred over salpingectomy because the preservation of both tubes is assumed to offer favourable fertility prospects, although little evidence exists to support this assumption. We aimed to assess whether salpingotomy would improve rates of ongoing pregnancy by natural conception compared with salpingectomy.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1483-1489
Journal	Lancet
Volume	383
Issue number	9927
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60123-9
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2014

Access to Document

10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60123-9

Cite this

Mol, F., van Mello, N. M., Strandell, A., Strandell, K., Jurkovic, D., Ross, J., Barnhart, K. T., Yalcinkaya, T. M., Verhoeve, H. R., Graziosi, G. C. M., Koks, C. A. M., Klinte, I., Hogström, L., Janssen, I. C. A. H., Kragt, H., Hoek, A., Trimbos-Kemper, T. C. M., Broekmans, F. J. M., Willemsen, W. N. P., ... Hajenius, P. J. (2014). Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 383(9927), 1483-1489. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60123-9

@article{6c6a94e12aba4e7990d8bf522cbffb43,

title = "Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial",

abstract = "Background tubal ectopic pregnancy can be surgically treated by salpingectomy, in which the affected fallopian tube is removed, or salpingotomy, in which the tube is preserved. Despite potentially increased risks of persistent trophoblast and repeat ectopic pregnancy, salpingotomy is often preferred over salpingectomy because the preservation of both tubes is assumed to offer favourable fertility prospects, although little evidence exists to support this assumption. We aimed to assess whether salpingotomy would improve rates of ongoing pregnancy by natural conception compared with salpingectomy.",

author = "F. Mol and {van Mello}, N.M. and A. Strandell and K. Strandell and D. Jurkovic and J. Ross and K.T. Barnhart and T.M. Yalcinkaya and H.R. Verhoeve and G.C.M. Graziosi and C.A.M. Koks and I. Klinte and L. Hogstr{\"o}m and I.C.A.H. Janssen and H. Kragt and A. Hoek and T.C.M. Trimbos-Kemper and F.J.M. Broekmans and W.N.P. Willemsen and W.M. Ankum and B.W. Mol and {van Wely}, M. and {van der Veen}, F. and {van Dessel}, H. and {European Surgery in Ectopic Pregnancy (ESEP) study group}, the and P.J. Hajenius",

year = "2014",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60123-9",

language = "English",

volume = "383",

pages = "1483--1489",

journal = "Lancet",

issn = "0140-6736",

publisher = "Elsevier Science",

number = "9927",

}

Mol, F, van Mello, NM, Strandell, A, Strandell, K, Jurkovic, D, Ross, J, Barnhart, KT, Yalcinkaya, TM, Verhoeve, HR, Graziosi, GCM, Koks, CAM, Klinte, I, Hogström, L, Janssen, ICAH, Kragt, H, Hoek, A, Trimbos-Kemper, TCM, Broekmans, FJM, Willemsen, WNP, Ankum, WM, Mol, BW, van Wely, M, van der Veen, F, van Dessel, H, European Surgery in Ectopic Pregnancy (ESEP) study group, T & Hajenius, PJ 2014, 'Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial', Lancet, vol. 383, no. 9927, pp. 1483-1489. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60123-9

TY - JOUR

T1 - Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

AU - Mol, F.

AU - van Mello, N.M.

AU - Strandell, A.

AU - Strandell, K.

AU - Jurkovic, D.

AU - Ross, J.

AU - Barnhart, K.T.

AU - Yalcinkaya, T.M.

AU - Verhoeve, H.R.

AU - Graziosi, G.C.M.

AU - Koks, C.A.M.

AU - Klinte, I.

AU - Hogström, L.

AU - Janssen, I.C.A.H.

AU - Kragt, H.

AU - Hoek, A.

AU - Trimbos-Kemper, T.C.M.

AU - Broekmans, F.J.M.

AU - Willemsen, W.N.P.

AU - Ankum, W.M.

AU - Mol, B.W.

AU - van Wely, M.

AU - van der Veen, F.

AU - van Dessel, H.

AU - European Surgery in Ectopic Pregnancy (ESEP) study group, the

AU - Hajenius, P.J.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Background tubal ectopic pregnancy can be surgically treated by salpingectomy, in which the affected fallopian tube is removed, or salpingotomy, in which the tube is preserved. Despite potentially increased risks of persistent trophoblast and repeat ectopic pregnancy, salpingotomy is often preferred over salpingectomy because the preservation of both tubes is assumed to offer favourable fertility prospects, although little evidence exists to support this assumption. We aimed to assess whether salpingotomy would improve rates of ongoing pregnancy by natural conception compared with salpingectomy.

AB - Background tubal ectopic pregnancy can be surgically treated by salpingectomy, in which the affected fallopian tube is removed, or salpingotomy, in which the tube is preserved. Despite potentially increased risks of persistent trophoblast and repeat ectopic pregnancy, salpingotomy is often preferred over salpingectomy because the preservation of both tubes is assumed to offer favourable fertility prospects, although little evidence exists to support this assumption. We aimed to assess whether salpingotomy would improve rates of ongoing pregnancy by natural conception compared with salpingectomy.

U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60123-9

DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60123-9

M3 - Article

SN - 0140-6736

VL - 383

SP - 1483

EP - 1489

JO - Lancet

JF - Lancet

IS - 9927

ER -

Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this