TY - JOUR
T1 - Responsible Design Thinking for Sustainable Development
T2 - Critical Literature Review, New Conceptual Framework, and Research Agenda
AU - Baldassarre, Brian
AU - Calabretta, Giulia
AU - Karpen, Ingo Oswald
AU - Bocken, Nancy
AU - Hultink, Erik Jan
N1 - data source:
PY - 2024/2/1
Y1 - 2024/2/1
N2 - In the 1960s, influential thinkers defined design as a rational problem-solving approach to deal with the challenges of sustainable human development. In 2009, a design consultant and a business academic selected some of these ideas and successfully branded them with the term "design thinking." As a result, design thinking has developed into a stream of innovation management research discussing how to innovate faster and better in competitive markets. This article aims to foster a reconsideration of the purposes of design thinking moving forward, in view of the sustainable development challenges intertwined with accelerating innovation in a perpetual economic growth paradigm. To this end, we use a problematization method to challenge innovation management research on design thinking. As part of this method, we first systematically collect and critically analyze the articles in this research stream. We uncover a prominent focus on economic impact, while social and environmental impacts remain largely neglected. To overcome this critical limitation, we integrate design thinking with responsible innovation theorizing. We develop a framework for responsible design thinking, explaining how to apply this approach beyond a private interest and competitive advantage logic, to address sustainable development challenges, such as climate change, resource depletion, poverty, and injustice. The framework contributes to strengthening the practical relevance of design thinking and its theoretical foundations. To catalyze this effort, we propose an agenda for future research.
AB - In the 1960s, influential thinkers defined design as a rational problem-solving approach to deal with the challenges of sustainable human development. In 2009, a design consultant and a business academic selected some of these ideas and successfully branded them with the term "design thinking." As a result, design thinking has developed into a stream of innovation management research discussing how to innovate faster and better in competitive markets. This article aims to foster a reconsideration of the purposes of design thinking moving forward, in view of the sustainable development challenges intertwined with accelerating innovation in a perpetual economic growth paradigm. To this end, we use a problematization method to challenge innovation management research on design thinking. As part of this method, we first systematically collect and critically analyze the articles in this research stream. We uncover a prominent focus on economic impact, while social and environmental impacts remain largely neglected. To overcome this critical limitation, we integrate design thinking with responsible innovation theorizing. We develop a framework for responsible design thinking, explaining how to apply this approach beyond a private interest and competitive advantage logic, to address sustainable development challenges, such as climate change, resource depletion, poverty, and injustice. The framework contributes to strengthening the practical relevance of design thinking and its theoretical foundations. To catalyze this effort, we propose an agenda for future research.
KW - Design
KW - Responsible innovation
KW - Responsible business
KW - Circular economy
KW - Sustainable innovation
KW - Sustainability
KW - GRAND CHALLENGES
KW - BUSINESS ETHICS
KW - INNOVATION
KW - MANAGEMENT
KW - PERSPECTIVE
KW - CREATION
U2 - 10.1007/s10551-023-05600-z
DO - 10.1007/s10551-023-05600-z
M3 - (Systematic) Review article
SN - 0167-4544
JO - Journal of Business Ethics
JF - Journal of Business Ethics
ER -