Response to Keriel-Gascou et al.: Higher efficiency and other alleged advantages are not inherent to the stepped wedge design

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)834-836
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume67
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2014

Keywords

  • CLUSTER RANDOMIZED-TRIALS
  • SAMPLE-SIZE
  • INTERVENTIONS

Cite this

@article{0d4ea93d23534af8965a2ec1f6307cc7,
title = "Response to Keriel-Gascou et al.: Higher efficiency and other alleged advantages are not inherent to the stepped wedge design",
keywords = "CLUSTER RANDOMIZED-TRIALS, SAMPLE-SIZE, INTERVENTIONS",
author = "W. Viechtbauer and D. Kotz and M. Spigt and I.C.W. Arts and R. Crutzen",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.015",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "834--836",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "7",

}

Response to Keriel-Gascou et al.: Higher efficiency and other alleged advantages are not inherent to the stepped wedge design. / Viechtbauer, W.; Kotz, D.; Spigt, M.; Arts, I.C.W.; Crutzen, R.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 67, No. 7, 07.2014, p. 834-836.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to Keriel-Gascou et al.: Higher efficiency and other alleged advantages are not inherent to the stepped wedge design

AU - Viechtbauer, W.

AU - Kotz, D.

AU - Spigt, M.

AU - Arts, I.C.W.

AU - Crutzen, R.

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

KW - CLUSTER RANDOMIZED-TRIALS

KW - SAMPLE-SIZE

KW - INTERVENTIONS

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.015

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.015

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

VL - 67

SP - 834

EP - 836

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 7

ER -