Reported Affect Changes as a Function of Response Delay: Findings From a Pooled Dataset of Nine Experience Sampling Studies

G. Eisele*, H. Vachon, I. Myin-Germeys, W. Viechtbauer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Web of Science)

Abstract

Delayed responses are a common phenomenon in experience sampling studies. Yet no consensus exists on whether they should be excluded from the analysis or what the threshold for exclusion should be. Delayed responses could introduce bias, but previous investigations of systematic differences between delayed and timely responses have offered unclear results. To investigate differences as a function of delay, we conducted secondary analyses of nine paper and pencil based experience sampling studies including 1,528 individuals with different clinical statuses. In all participants, there were significant decreases in positive and increases in negative affect as a function of delay. In addition, delayed answers of participants without depression showed higher within-person variability and an initial strengthening in the relationships between contextual stress and affect. Participants with depression mostly showed the opposite pattern. Delayed responses seem qualitatively different from timely responses. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying these differences.
Original languageEnglish
Article number580684
Number of pages12
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Feb 2021

Keywords

  • ambulatory assessment
  • ecological momentary assessment
  • experience sampling
  • response delay
  • response latency
  • DEPRESSION
  • ECOLOGICAL MOMENTARY ASSESSMENT
  • PAPER
  • SHROUT
  • INDIVIDUALS
  • PSYCHOSIS
  • RAFAELI
  • STRESS REACTIVITY
  • DAILY-LIFE
  • CORTISOL

Cite this