Relational Discovery in Category Learning

Micah B. Goldwater*, Hilary J. Don, Moritz J. F. Krusche, Evan J. Livesey

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Learning categories defined by the relations among objects supports the transfer of knowledge from initial learning contexts to novel contexts that share few surface similarities. Often relational categories have correlated (but nonessential) surface features, which can be a distraction from discovering the category-defining relations, preventing knowledge transfer. This is one explanation for "the inert knowledge problem" in education wherein many students fail to spontaneously apply their learning outside the classroom. Here we present a series of experiments using artificial categories that correlate surface features and relational patterns during learning. Our goal was to determine what task parameters and individual differences in learners shift focus to the relational aspect of the category and foster transfer to novel disparate exemplars. We consistently showed that the effectiveness of task structure manipulations (e.g., the sequence of learning exemplars) depended on the learners' strategies (e.g., whether learners are oriented toward discovering rules or focusing on exemplars). Further, we found support that "inference-learning," wherein learners are presented with incomplete exemplars and learn how to infer the missing pieces, is an effective way to promote relational discovery and transfer, even for learners who are not predisposed to make such discoveries.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages35
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology-General
Volume147
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Keywords

  • categories and concepts
  • individual differences
  • inert knowledge
  • knowledge transfer
  • relational categories
  • ABSTRACT COHERENT CATEGORIES
  • INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES
  • STRUCTURAL ALIGNMENT
  • CONCEPTUAL CHANGE
  • CONTEXT THEORY
  • KNOWLEDGE
  • CLASSIFICATION
  • SIMILARITY
  • MEMORY
  • INFERENCE

Cite this