Abstract
In this comment on Patihis and Pendergrast (this issue, p. 3), we challenge an assumption that underpins recovered memory therapies: that there exists a close link of traumatic experiences with dissociation. We further suggest that (a) researchers examine how therapists who believe in repressed memories instill this belief in clients and establish expectations that current problems can be interpreted in light of past traumatic experiences, (b) recovered memories could be classified and studied as a function of how events come to light and are interpreted, and (c) therapists routinely provide informed consent regarding recovered memories and suggestive techniques.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 22-24 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Clinical Psychological Science |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2019 |
Keywords
- INFORMED CONSENT
- DISSOCIATION
- TRAUMA