Real-world analysis of manual editing of deep learning contouring in the thorax region

Femke Vaassen*, Djamal Boukerroui, Padraig Looney, Richard Canters, Karolien Verhoeven, Stephanie Peeters, Indra Lubken, Jolein Mannens, Mark J Gooding, Wouter van Elmpt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background and purpose: User-adjustments after deep-learning (DL) contouring in radiotherapy were evaluated to get insight in real-world editing during clinical practice. This study assessed the amount, type and spatial regions of editing of auto-contouring for organs-at-risk (OARs) in routine clinical workflow for patients in the thorax region.

Materials and methods: A total of 350 lung cancer and 362 breast cancer patients, contoured between March 2020 and March 2021 using a commercial DL-contouring method followed by manual adjustments were retrospectively analyzed. Subsampling was performed for some OARs, using an inter-slice gap of 1-3 slices. Commonly-used whole-organ contouring assessment measures were calculated, and all cases were registered to a common reference shape per OAR to identify regions of manual adjustment. Results were expressed as the median, 10th-90th percentile of adjustment and visualized using 3D renderings.

Results: Per OAR, the median amount of editing was below 1 mm. However, large adjustments were found in some locations for most OARs. In general, enlarging of the auto-contours was needed. Subsampling DL-contours showed less adjustments were made in the interpolated slices compared to simulated no-subsampling for these OARs.

Conclusion: The real-world performance of automatic DL-contouring software was evaluated and proven useful in clinical practice. Specific regions-of-adjustment were identified per OAR in the thorax region, and separate models were found to be necessary for specific clinical indications different from training data. This analysis showed the need to perform routine clinical analysis especially when procedures or acquisition protocols change to have the best configuration of the workflow.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)104-110
Number of pages7
JournalPhysics & Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Volume22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2022

Keywords

  • AT-RISK
  • ATLAS
  • AUTO-SEGMENTATION
  • Auto-contouring
  • Automatic segmentation
  • CANCER
  • Contour adjustment
  • DELINEATION
  • Deep-learning
  • IMPACT
  • IMPLEMENTATION
  • ORGANS
  • RADIATION-THERAPY
  • RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Radiotherapy
  • Thorax organs at risk

Cite this