Rapid acting fentanyl formulations in breakthrough pain in cancer. Drug selection by means of the System of Objectified Judgement Analysis

R. Janknegt*, M. van den Beuken, S. Schiere, M. Uberall, R. Knaggs, J. Hanley, M. Thronaes

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review article peer-review

Abstract

Drug selection of rapid acting fentanyl formulations in the treatment of breakthrough pain in patients with cancer is performed by the System of Objectified Judgement Analysis method. All seven available formulations were included in the analysis. The following selection criteria were used: number of available strengths, variability in the rate of absorption, interactions, clinical efficacy, side effects, ease of administration and documentation. No direct double-blind comparative studies between two or more formulations were identified and the clinical documentation of all formulations is limited. The most distinguishing criterion was ease of use. This led to slightly higher scores for Abstral, Instanyl and PecFent than for the other formulations. The pros and cons of each formulation should be discussed with the patient, and the most suitable formulation selected for each individual patient.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2
Number of pages18
JournalEuropean Journal of Hospital Pharmacy - Science and Practice
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Keywords

  • CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
  • ONCOLOGY
  • PECTIN NASAL SPRAY
  • BUCCAL TABLET
  • OPEN-LABEL
  • MU-G
  • INTRANASAL FENTANYL
  • DOSE-TITRATION
  • DOUBLE-BLIND
  • CITRATE
  • TOLERABILITY
  • CROSSOVER

Cite this