Personality disorders in older adults: Differences in self-informant ratings

Krystle A. P. Penders*, Gina Rossi, Inge Debast, Daniel L. Segal, Inge G. P. Peeters, Job F. M. Metsemakers, Sebastiaan P. J. van Alphen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Previous research on self-informant reports in assessing personality disorders (PDs) has been mainly focused on adults, leaving older adults under-studied. We examined self-informant agreement in PD screening among older adults (& GE;60 years) using the Gerontological Personality disorders Scale (GPS). Potential differences such as who reports more personality pathology on a PD screener (i.e., GPS), item accessibility and the effect of relational aspects were studied as well. Data of 326 older adult-informant dyads, of which the older adults were sampled from five general practices in the Netherlands, were used. Results indicate that self-informant agreement ranged from r = 0.26-0.73, with lower concordance on the GPS-subscale measuring intrapersonal aspects of personality pathology. Informants were more sensitive to habitual pathological personality features than older adults. Two GPS items showed differential item functioning across self- and informant-report. Of relational aspects, only congeniality affected the GPS-iv scores; lower ratings on congeniality were associated with higher GPS-iv scores (i.e., higher reporting of personality problems).
Original languageEnglish
Article number1592
Pages (from-to)32-42
Number of pages11
JournalPersonality and Mental Health
Volume18
Issue number1
Early online date1 Oct 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2024

Keywords

  • DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY
  • SEVERITY INDEXES
  • COMMUNITY SAMPLE
  • AGREEMENT
  • PSYCHOPATHOLOGY
  • RELIABILITY
  • PREVALENCE
  • INVENTORY
  • VALIDITY
  • TRAITS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Personality disorders in older adults: Differences in self-informant ratings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this