Perceptions and beliefs of general practitioners on their role in the cancer screening programmes in the Netherlands: a mixed-methods study

Thomas H G Bongaerts*, Frederike L Büchner, Vera Nierkens, Matty R Crone, Onno R Guicherit, Mattijs E Numans

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, population-based cancer screening programmes (CSPs) are organized aiming at cervical, breast and colorectal cancer. For a CSP to be effective, high participation rates are essential; however, there is an alarming downward trend, including wide regional variation in screening uptake. General practitioner (GP) involvement can have a stimulating effect on screening participation. Current GP involvement is however, limited, varies between the programmes and has changed over time. Unexplored is what GPs think of their role(s) in the CSPs. The aim of this study was therefore to map the perceptions and beliefs of GPs regarding their current and future role in the Dutch CSPs. METHODS: A mixed-methods sequential explanatory study was conducted in the Leiden/The Hague area of the Netherlands, between the end of 2021 and 2022. A questionnaire was developed and distributed among 110 GPs. The aggregated results obtained from the questionnaires served as starting points for conducting semi-structured interviews, with purposefully selected GPs. With this sequential approach we aimed to further enhance the understanding of the questionnaire data, and delved into the topics that emerged from the questionnaire responses. RESULTS: In total, 46 GPs completed the online questionnaire (response rate 42%). Subsequent five semi-structured comprehensive interviews were conducted. GPs indicated that they frequently encounter the CSP in their daily practice and consider it important. They also emphasised it is important that GPs remain closely involved with the CSPs in the future. Nevertheless, GPs also repeatedly mentioned that they are not eager to take on more logistical/organizational tasks. They are however willing to empower CSPs in a positive manner. CONCLUSION: GPs were generally positive about the CSPs and their current role within these programmes. Nevertheless, several options have been proposed to improve the CSPs, especially to increase screening uptake for populations in a socioeconomically disadvantaged position. Since it is of utmost importance to screen those who are most at risk of developing the screening-specific tumours, efforts should be made to achieve this goal.
Original languageEnglish
Article number129
Number of pages9
JournalBMC primary care
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Apr 2024

Keywords

  • Cancer screening
  • General practitioner
  • Netherlands
  • Participation
  • Primary care
  • Humans
  • Netherlands/epidemiology
  • General Practitioners/psychology
  • Early Detection of Cancer/psychology
  • Female
  • Male
  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Middle Aged
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Physician's Role
  • Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis
  • Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis psychology
  • Adult
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis
  • Mass Screening/methods psychology

Cite this