Outcomes of elective liver surgery worldwide: a global, prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study

Massimo Malago, Alejandro Serrablo, Dimitri Aristotle Raptis*, Christos Dervenis, Karl Jurgen Oldhafer, Marcel Autran Machado, Norihiro Kokudo, Pal-Dag Line, Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro, Stefan Breitenstein, Thomas van Gulik, Yaman Tokat, Ulf Peter Neumann, Aditya Borakati, Andrea Monaco, Andreas A. Schnitzbauer, Arthur Elfrink, Carlijn Buis, Camila Hidalgo Salinas, Charles ImberDaniele Ferraro, Deniz Balci, Erik Schadde, Fiammetta Soggiu, Georg Lurje, Gregor A. Stavrou, Ioannis Passas, James Pape, Marc Bemelmans, Marieke de Boer, Omid Madadi-Sanjani, Pim Olthof, Rahul Koti, Stefen Gilg, Steven Olde Damink, Sven Lang, Theodora Pissanou, Thomas Hanna, Victoria Ardiles, Ahmed Belhadj Mostefa, Jeremias Goransky, Lucas McCormack, Nicolas Resio, George Petrou, Thomas Hugh, Vincent Lam, Thomas Gruenberger, Aliaksei Shcherba, Claude Bertrand, Mathieu D'Hondt, Et al.

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background:The outcomes of liver surgery worldwide remain unknown. The true population-based outcomes are likely different to those vastly reported that reflect the activity of highly specialized academic centers. The aim of this study was to measure the true worldwide practice of liver surgery and associated outcomes by recruiting from centers across the globe. The geographic distribution of liver surgery activity and complexity was also evaluated to further understand variations in outcomes.Methods:LiverGroup.org was an international, prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study following the Global Surgery Collaborative Snapshot Research approach with a 3-month prospective, consecutive patient enrollment within January-December 2019. Each patient was followed up for 90 days postoperatively. All patients undergoing liver surgery at their respective centers were eligible for study inclusion. Basic demographics, patient and operation characteristics were collected. Morbidity was recorded according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications. Country-based and hospital-based data were collected, including the Human Development Index (HDI). (NCT03768141).Results:A total of 2159 patients were included from six continents. Surgery was performed for cancer in 1785 (83%) patients. Of all patients, 912 (42%) experienced a postoperative complication of any severity, while the major complication rate was 16% (341/2159). The overall 90-day mortality rate after liver surgery was 3.8% (82/2,159). The overall failure to rescue rate was 11% (82/ 722) ranging from 5 to 35% among the higher and lower HDI groups, respectively.Conclusions:This is the first to our knowledge global surgery study specifically designed and conducted for specialized liver surgery. The authors identified failure to rescue as a significant potentially modifiable factor for mortality after liver surgery, mostly related to lower Human Development Index countries. Members of the LiverGroup.org network could now work together to develop quality improvement collaboratives.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3954-3966
Number of pages13
JournalInternational journal of surgery (London, England)
Volume109
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2023

Keywords

  • failure to rescue
  • global surgery
  • human development index
  • liver surgery
  • morbidity
  • mortality
  • outcomes
  • RESECTION
  • HEPATECTOMY
  • FAILURE
  • RESCUE
  • BENIGN
  • COHORT
  • HEALTH
  • IMPACT
  • INDEX

Cite this