Object recognition testing: methodological considerations on exploration and discrimination measures

S. Akkerman, A. Blokland, O. Reneerkens, N.P. Goethem, E. Bollen, H.J.M. Gijselaers, C.K.J. Lieben, H.W.M. Steinbusch, J. Prickaerts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The object recognition task (ORT) is a popular one-trial learning test for animals. In the current study, we investigated several methodological issues concerning the task. Data was pooled from 28 ORT studies, containing 731 male Wistar rats. We investigated the relationship between 3 common absolute- and relative discrimination measures, as well as their relation to exploratory activity. In this context, the effects of pre-experimental habituation, object familiarity, trial duration, retention interval and the amnesic drugs MK-801 and scopolamine were investigated. Our analyses showed that the ORT is very sensitive, capable of detecting subtle differences in memory (discrimination) and exploratory performance. As a consequence, it is susceptible to potential biases due to (injection) stress and side effects of drugs. Our data indicated that a minimum amount of exploration is required in the sample and test trial for stable significant discrimination performance. However, there was no relationship between the level of exploration in the sample trial and discrimination performance. In addition, the level of exploration in the test trial was positively related to the absolute discrimination measure, whereas this was not the case for relative discrimination measures, which correct for exploratory differences, making them more resistant to exploration biases. Animals appeared to remember object information over multiple test sessions. Therefore, when animals have encountered both objects in prior test sessions, the object preference observed in the test trial of 1 h retention intervals is probably due to a relative difference in familiarity between the objects in the test trial, rather than true novelty per se. Taken together, our findings suggest to take into consideration pre-experimental exposure (familiarization) to objects, habituation to treatment procedures, and the use of relative discrimination measures when using the ORT. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)335-347
JournalBehavioural Brain Research
Volume232
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012

Cite this

Akkerman, S. ; Blokland, A. ; Reneerkens, O. ; Goethem, N.P. ; Bollen, E. ; Gijselaers, H.J.M. ; Lieben, C.K.J. ; Steinbusch, H.W.M. ; Prickaerts, J. / Object recognition testing: methodological considerations on exploration and discrimination measures. In: Behavioural Brain Research. 2012 ; Vol. 232, No. 2. pp. 335-347.
@article{0e6266d873a2481d92866ccb2027dfdd,
title = "Object recognition testing: methodological considerations on exploration and discrimination measures",
abstract = "The object recognition task (ORT) is a popular one-trial learning test for animals. In the current study, we investigated several methodological issues concerning the task. Data was pooled from 28 ORT studies, containing 731 male Wistar rats. We investigated the relationship between 3 common absolute- and relative discrimination measures, as well as their relation to exploratory activity. In this context, the effects of pre-experimental habituation, object familiarity, trial duration, retention interval and the amnesic drugs MK-801 and scopolamine were investigated. Our analyses showed that the ORT is very sensitive, capable of detecting subtle differences in memory (discrimination) and exploratory performance. As a consequence, it is susceptible to potential biases due to (injection) stress and side effects of drugs. Our data indicated that a minimum amount of exploration is required in the sample and test trial for stable significant discrimination performance. However, there was no relationship between the level of exploration in the sample trial and discrimination performance. In addition, the level of exploration in the test trial was positively related to the absolute discrimination measure, whereas this was not the case for relative discrimination measures, which correct for exploratory differences, making them more resistant to exploration biases. Animals appeared to remember object information over multiple test sessions. Therefore, when animals have encountered both objects in prior test sessions, the object preference observed in the test trial of 1 h retention intervals is probably due to a relative difference in familiarity between the objects in the test trial, rather than true novelty per se. Taken together, our findings suggest to take into consideration pre-experimental exposure (familiarization) to objects, habituation to treatment procedures, and the use of relative discrimination measures when using the ORT. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
author = "S. Akkerman and A. Blokland and O. Reneerkens and N.P. Goethem and E. Bollen and H.J.M. Gijselaers and C.K.J. Lieben and H.W.M. Steinbusch and J. Prickaerts",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.bbr.2012.03.022",
language = "English",
volume = "232",
pages = "335--347",
journal = "Behavioural Brain Research",
issn = "0166-4328",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "2",

}

Object recognition testing: methodological considerations on exploration and discrimination measures. / Akkerman, S.; Blokland, A.; Reneerkens, O.; Goethem, N.P.; Bollen, E.; Gijselaers, H.J.M.; Lieben, C.K.J.; Steinbusch, H.W.M.; Prickaerts, J.

In: Behavioural Brain Research, Vol. 232, No. 2, 01.01.2012, p. 335-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Object recognition testing: methodological considerations on exploration and discrimination measures

AU - Akkerman, S.

AU - Blokland, A.

AU - Reneerkens, O.

AU - Goethem, N.P.

AU - Bollen, E.

AU - Gijselaers, H.J.M.

AU - Lieben, C.K.J.

AU - Steinbusch, H.W.M.

AU - Prickaerts, J.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - The object recognition task (ORT) is a popular one-trial learning test for animals. In the current study, we investigated several methodological issues concerning the task. Data was pooled from 28 ORT studies, containing 731 male Wistar rats. We investigated the relationship between 3 common absolute- and relative discrimination measures, as well as their relation to exploratory activity. In this context, the effects of pre-experimental habituation, object familiarity, trial duration, retention interval and the amnesic drugs MK-801 and scopolamine were investigated. Our analyses showed that the ORT is very sensitive, capable of detecting subtle differences in memory (discrimination) and exploratory performance. As a consequence, it is susceptible to potential biases due to (injection) stress and side effects of drugs. Our data indicated that a minimum amount of exploration is required in the sample and test trial for stable significant discrimination performance. However, there was no relationship between the level of exploration in the sample trial and discrimination performance. In addition, the level of exploration in the test trial was positively related to the absolute discrimination measure, whereas this was not the case for relative discrimination measures, which correct for exploratory differences, making them more resistant to exploration biases. Animals appeared to remember object information over multiple test sessions. Therefore, when animals have encountered both objects in prior test sessions, the object preference observed in the test trial of 1 h retention intervals is probably due to a relative difference in familiarity between the objects in the test trial, rather than true novelty per se. Taken together, our findings suggest to take into consideration pre-experimental exposure (familiarization) to objects, habituation to treatment procedures, and the use of relative discrimination measures when using the ORT. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

AB - The object recognition task (ORT) is a popular one-trial learning test for animals. In the current study, we investigated several methodological issues concerning the task. Data was pooled from 28 ORT studies, containing 731 male Wistar rats. We investigated the relationship between 3 common absolute- and relative discrimination measures, as well as their relation to exploratory activity. In this context, the effects of pre-experimental habituation, object familiarity, trial duration, retention interval and the amnesic drugs MK-801 and scopolamine were investigated. Our analyses showed that the ORT is very sensitive, capable of detecting subtle differences in memory (discrimination) and exploratory performance. As a consequence, it is susceptible to potential biases due to (injection) stress and side effects of drugs. Our data indicated that a minimum amount of exploration is required in the sample and test trial for stable significant discrimination performance. However, there was no relationship between the level of exploration in the sample trial and discrimination performance. In addition, the level of exploration in the test trial was positively related to the absolute discrimination measure, whereas this was not the case for relative discrimination measures, which correct for exploratory differences, making them more resistant to exploration biases. Animals appeared to remember object information over multiple test sessions. Therefore, when animals have encountered both objects in prior test sessions, the object preference observed in the test trial of 1 h retention intervals is probably due to a relative difference in familiarity between the objects in the test trial, rather than true novelty per se. Taken together, our findings suggest to take into consideration pre-experimental exposure (familiarization) to objects, habituation to treatment procedures, and the use of relative discrimination measures when using the ORT. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

U2 - 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.03.022

DO - 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.03.022

M3 - Article

VL - 232

SP - 335

EP - 347

JO - Behavioural Brain Research

JF - Behavioural Brain Research

SN - 0166-4328

IS - 2

ER -