Neuropsychological test performance and self-reported cognitive functioning associated with work-related outcomes in occupationally active cancer survivors with cognitive complaints

Kete M Klaver, Saskia F A Duijts, Chantal A V Geusgens, Maureen J B Aarts, Rudolf W H M Ponds, Allard J van der Beek, Sanne B Schagen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess cognitive functioning in occupationally active non-central nervous system cancer survivors with cognitive complaints using neuropsychological tests, and to investigate the association between (1) formally assessed cognitive functioning and self-reported work-related outcomes and (2) self-reported cognitive functioning at work and self-reported work-related outcomes.

METHODS: Baseline data of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (n = 279) were used. Associations between neuropsychological test performance (Amsterdam Cognition Scan) and self-reported cognitive functioning (Cognitive Symptom Checklist-work) with work ability (Work Ability Index) and work functioning (Work Role Functioning Questionnaire) were examined using multivariate linear regression.

RESULTS: Thirty percent of cancer survivors had lower than expected performance on neuropsychological tests. Higher overall neuropsychological test performance was associated with better work ability (Cohen's f2 = 0.014) and physical functioning at work (Cohen's f2 = 0.13). Furthermore, higher motor performance was associated with better work ability (Cohen's f2 = 0.018). In addition, self-reported work-related cognitive complaints were associated with self-reported work-related outcomes (Cohen's f2 = 0.13-0.35).

CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of cancer survivors with lower than expected performance on neuropsychological tests exceeded the percentage expected in a normal population. This neuropsychological test performance was weakly associated with various aspects of work ability and work functioning. Stronger associations were found between self-reported cognitive functioning at work with self-reported work-related outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: A cognitive rehabilitation approach that specifically aims at reducing cognitive symptoms at work could be a valuable part of interventions that aim to improve work-related outcomes. Trial registration The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03900806) at 03 April 2019 (current status: ongoing), https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03900806?term=NCT03900806&draw=2&rank=1.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)412-424
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Cancer Survivorship-Research and Practice
Volume18
Issue number2
Early online date1 Jul 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • ABILITY
  • Cancer-related cognitive impairment
  • EMPLOYMENT
  • Employment
  • FATIGUE
  • HEALTH
  • IMPAIRMENT
  • MANAGEMENT
  • Neuropsychological test performance
  • RETURN
  • WOMEN
  • Work ability
  • Work functioning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Neuropsychological test performance and self-reported cognitive functioning associated with work-related outcomes in occupationally active cancer survivors with cognitive complaints'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this