Neurocognitive Profiles of 22q11.2 and 16p11.2 Deletions and Duplications

Rare recurrent copy number variants (CNVs) at chromosomal loci 22q11.2 and 16p11.2 are among the most common rare genetic disorders associated with significant risk for neuropsychiatric disorders across the lifespan. Microdeletions and duplications in these loci are associated with neurocognitive deficits, yet there are few studies comparing these groups using the same measures. We address this gap in a prospective international collaboration applying the same computerized neurocognitive assessment. The Penn Computerized Neurocognitive Battery (CNB) was administered in a multi-site study on rare genomic disorders: 22q11.2 deletion (n = 397); 22q11.2 duplication (n = 77); 16p11.2 deletion (n = 94); and 16p11.2 duplication (n = 26). Domains examined include executive functions, episodic memory, complex cognition, social cognition, and sensori-motor speed. Accuracy and speed for each neurocognitive domain were included as dependent measures in a mixed-model repeated measures analysis, with locus (22q11.2, 16p11.2) and copy number (deletion/duplication) as grouping factors and neurocognitive domain as a repeated measures factor, with age and sex as covariates. We also examined correlation with IQ and site effects. We found that 22q11.2 deletions were associated with greater deficits in overall performance accuracy than 22q11.2 duplications, while 16p11.2 duplications were associated with greater deficits than 16p11.2 deletions. Duplications at both loci were associated with reduced speed. Performance profiles differed among the groups with particularly poor performance of 16p11.2 duplication on non-verbal reasoning and social cognition. Average accuracy on the CNB was moderately correlated with Full Scale IQ. No site effects were observed. Deletions and duplications of 22q11.2 and 16p11.2 have varied effects on neurocognition indicating locus specificity, with performance profiles differing among the groups. These profile differences can help inform mechanistic substrates to heterogeneity in presentation and outcome. Future studies could aim to link performance profiles to clinical features and brain function.