Nationwide Use and Outcome of Surgery for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Following Induction Chemotherapy

Thomas F. Stoop*, Leonard W. F. Seelen, Freek R. van 't Land, Kishan R. D. Lutchman, Susan van Dieren, Daan J. Lips, Erwin van der Harst, Geert Kazemier, Gijs A. Patijn, Ignace H. de Hingh, Jan H. Wijsman, Joris I. Erdmann, Sebastiaan Festen, Bas Groot Koerkamp, J. Sven D. Mieog, Marcel den Dulk, Martijn W. J. Stommel, Olivier R. Busch, Roeland F. de Wilde, Vincent E. de MeijerWouter te Riele, I. Quintus Molenaar, Casper H. J. van Eijck, Hjalmar C. van Santvoort, Marc G. Besselink*, Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Several international high-volume centers have reported good outcomes after resection of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) following chemo(radio)therapy, but it is unclear how this translates to nationwide clinical practice and outcome. This study aims to assess the nationwide use and outcome of resection of LAPC following induction chemo(radio)therapy. Patients and Methods: A multicenter retrospective study including all patients who underwent resection for LAPC following chemo(radio)therapy in all 16 Dutch pancreatic surgery centers (2014–2020), registered in the mandatory Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit. LAPC is defined as arterial involvement > 90° and/or portomesenteric venous > 270° involvement or occlusion. Results: Overall, 142 patients underwent resection for LAPC, of whom 34.5% met the 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. FOLFIRINOX was the most commonly (93.7%) used chemotherapy [median 5 cycles (IQR 4–8)]. Venous and arterial resections were performed in 51.4% and 14.8% of patients. Most resections (73.9%) were performed in high-volume centers (i.e., ≥ 60 pancreatoduodenectomies/year). Overall median volume of LAPC resections/center was 4 (IQR 1–7). In-hospital/30-day major morbidity was 37.3% and 90-day mortality was 4.2%. Median OS from diagnosis was 26 months (95% CI 23–28) and 5-year OS 18%. Surgery in high-volume centers [HR = 0.542 (95% CI 0.318–0.923)], ypN1-2 [HR = 3.141 (95% CI 1.886–5.234)], and major morbidity [HR = 2.031 (95% CI 1.272–3.244)] were associated with OS. Conclusions: Resection of LAPC following chemo(radio)therapy is infrequently performed in the Netherlands, albeit with acceptable morbidity, mortality, and OS. Given these findings, a structured nationwide approach involving international centers of excellence would be needed to improve selection of patients with LAPC for surgical resection following induction therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2640-2653
Number of pages14
JournalAnnals of Surgical Oncology
Volume31
Issue number4
Early online date1 Dec 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2024

Keywords

  • Pancreatic cancer
  • Locally advanced
  • Induction therapy
  • Surgery
  • TREATMENT STRATEGIES
  • CLINICAL-OUTCOMES
  • BORDERLINE
  • ADENOCARCINOMA
  • MULTICENTER

Cite this