Mothers' Views on Longer Storage of Neonatal Dried Blood Spots for Specific Secondary Uses

S.R. van Teeffelen, C.M.W. Douglas, C.G. van El*, S.S. Weinreich, L. Henneman, M. Radstake, M.C. Cornel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Neonatal dried blood spots (DBS) present a wealth of data. Currently, many countries discuss DBS storage, management and use. We collected data in the Netherlands on the awareness and views of an unheard stakeholder: mothers (-to-be). Methods: A survey was conducted on an Amsterdam pregnancy fair website in 2011. We included 1,272 women who were pregnant and/or had at least one child years old. A descriptive analysis was used to score the awareness of and views on policies regarding the length of storage and secondary use. Results: 18.9% of mothers (n = 1,272) were aware of all five current DBS screening, storage and use policies. The views were positive for all ten potential specific secondary uses. Most support was given to etiology research, while test development by a company was least supported. Extending the DBS storage beyond the 5-year status quo was approved by 67.8% of the respondents, indefinite storage was approved by 54.7%. Conclusion: Mothers indicate support of several secondary uses and prolonged storage of DBS but report a low awareness of current storage and secondary use policies. Efforts must be made to involve parents as key stakeholders in DBS policies. This could be achieved through a parent-led advisory structure. (C) 2015 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-33
Number of pages9
JournalPublic Health Genomics
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Biobank
  • Information
  • Informed consent
  • Newborn screening policy
  • Parental autonomy
  • Participatory governance
  • Public opinion
  • Research ethics
  • Research on minors
  • Stored samples
  • NEWBORN
  • SAMPLES
  • CARE

Cite this