Abstract
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 229-252 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | International Journal of Manpower |
Volume | 37 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
JEL classifications
- r23 - "Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics: Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population; Neighborhood Characteristics"
Keywords
- Monopsony
- Panel data
- Price-cost mark-ups
- Production function
- Rent sharing
- COST
- PANEL-DATA
- MODELS
- PRICE
- POWER
- EMPLOYMENT
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
Micro-evidence on product and labor market regime differences between Chile and France. / Dobbelaere, S.; Lauterbach, R.; Mairesse, J.
In: International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2016, p. 229-252.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Micro-evidence on product and labor market regime differences between Chile and France
AU - Dobbelaere, S.
AU - Lauterbach, R.
AU - Mairesse, J.
N1 - Export Date: 8 December 2016 Correspondence Address: Dobbelaere, S.; Department of Economics, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamNetherlands; email: sabien.dobbelaere@vu.nl References: Arellano, M., Bond, S., Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equation (1991) Review of Economic Studies, 58 (2), pp. 277-297. , ), “”; Arellano, M., Bover, O., Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models (1995) Journal of Econometric, 68 (1), pp. 29-51. , ), “”; Benavente, J.M., Dobbelaere, S., Mairesse, J., Interaction between product market and labour market power: evidence from France, Belgium and Chile (2009) Applied Economics Letters, 16 (6), pp. 573-577. , ), “”; Blundell, R.W., Bond, S.R., Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models (1998) Journal of Econometrics, 87 (1), pp. 115-143. , ), “”; Booth, A., Wage determination and imperfect competition (2014) Labour Economics, 30 (October), pp. 53-58. , ), “”; Boulhol, H., Do capital market and trade liberalization trigger labor market deregulation? (2009) Journal of International Economics, 77 (2), pp. 223-233. , ), “”; Boulhol, H., Dobbelaere, S., Maioli, S., Imports as product and labour market discipline (2011) British Journal of Industrial Relations, 49 (2), pp. 331-361. , ), “”; Brandt, N., Burniaux, J.M., Duval, R., (2005), ), “Assessing the OECD jobs strategy: past development reforms”, OECD WP 429, Organisation for Economic Cooperation Development, ParisDe Loecker, J., Goldberg, P.K., Firm performance in a global market (2014) Annual Review of Economics, 6 (1), pp. 201-227. , ), “”; De Loecker, J., Warzynski, F., Markups and firm-level export status (2012) American Economic Review, 102 (6), pp. 2437-2471. , ), “”; De Loecker, J., Goldberg, P.K., Khandelwal, A.K., Pavcnik, N., (2012), ), “Prices, markups trade reform”, NBER Working Paper 17925, National Bureau of Economic Research,Cambridge, MA:Dobbelaere, S., Estimation of price-cost margins and union bargaining power for Belgian manufacturing (2004) International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22 (10), pp. 1381-1398. , ), “”; Dobbelaere, S., Mairesse, J., Panel data estimates of the production function and product and labor market imperfections (2013) Journal of Applied Econometrics, 28 (1), pp. 1-46. , ), “”; Dobbelaere, S., Kiyota, K., Mairesse, J., Product and labor market imperfections and scale economies: micro-evidence on France, Japan and the Netherlands (2015) Journal of Comparative Economics, 43 (2), pp. 290-322. , ), “”; Durán-Palma, F., Wilkinson, A., Korczynski, M., Labour reform in a neo-liberal ‘protected’ democracy: Chile 1990-2001 (2005) International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16 (1), pp. 65-88. , ), “”; Ebell, M., Haefke, C., (2006), ), “Product market regulation endogenous union formation”, IZA DP 2222, Institute for the Study of Labor, BonnEberhardt, M., Helmer, C., (2010), ), “Untested assumptions data slicing: a critical review of firm-level production function estimators”, Department of Economics DP 513, University of Oxford,Oxford:Hall, R.E., The relationship between price and marginal cost in US industry (1988) Journal of Political Economy, 96 (5), pp. 921-947. , ), “”; Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W., Rosen, H.S., Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data (1988) Econometrica, 56 (6), pp. 1371-1395. , ), “”; McDonald, I.M., Solow, R.M., Wage bargaining and employment (1981) American Economic Review, 71 (5), pp. 896-908. , ), “”; Manning, A., (2003) Monopsony in Motion: Imperfect Competition in Labor Markets, , Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ:; Nickell, S.J., Andrews, M., Unions, real wages and employment in Britain 1951-79 (1983) Oxford Economic Papers, 35 (November), pp. 183-205. , ), “”; OECD, (2001), ), “The cross-market effects of product labour market policies”, OECD Economic Outlook 70, Organisation for Economic Cooperation Development, ParisOECD, (2005), ), “OECD guiding principles for regulatory quality performance”, OECD, ParisOECD, (2010), ), “Competition law policy in Chile: accession review”, OECD Country Studies, ParisPetrin, A., Sivadasan, J., Estimating lost output from allocative efficiency, with an application to Chile and firing costs (2013) Review of Economics and Statistics, 95 (1), pp. 286-301. , ), “”; Rodríguez, J.K., Employment relations in Chile: evidence of HRM practices (2010) Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations, 65 (3), pp. 424-446. , ), “”; Ronconi, L., Globalization, domestic institutions, and enforcement of labor law: evidence from Latin America (2012) Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 51 (1), pp. 89-105. , ), “”; Savin, N.E., Multiple hypothesis testing (1984) Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 2, pp. 827-879. , Griliches, Z.Intrilligator, M.D.), “”, in(Eds) North-Holl, Amsterdam:; Syverson, C., What determines productivity? (2011) Journal of Economic Literature, 49 (2), pp. 326-365. , ), “”; Venn, D., (2009), ), “Legislation, collective bargaining enforcement: updating the OECD employment protection indicators”, WP 89, OECD Social, Employment Migration, ParisWilcox, R.R., (2005) Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing (Statistical Modeling and Decision Science), , Academic Press, San Diego, CA:; Windmeijer, F., A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators (2005) Journal of Econometrics, 126 (1), pp. 25-51. , ), “”; Wölfl, A., Wanner, I., Röhn, O., Nicoletti, G., (2010), ), “Product market regulation: extending the analysis beyond OECD countries”, WP 799, OECD Economics Department, ParisWooldridge, J., (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Sections and Panel Data, , MIT Press, Cambridge, MA:
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Purpose – Institutions, social norms and the nature of industrial relations vary greatly between Latin American and Western European countries. Such institutional and organizational differences might shape firms’ operational environment in general and the type of competition in product and labor markets in particular. The purpose of this paper is to identify and quantify industry differences in product and labor market imperfections in Chile and France. Design/methodology/approach – The authors rely on two extensions of Hall’s econometric framework for estimating price-cost margins by nesting three labor market settings (LMS) (perfect competition (PC) or right-to-manage bargaining, efficient bargaining (EB) and monopsony). Using an unbalanced panel of 1,737 firms over the period 1996-2003 in Chile and 14,270 firms over the period 1994-2001 in France, the authors first classify 20 comparable manufacturing industries in six distinct regimes that differ in the type of competition prevailing in product and labor markets. The authors then investigate industry differences in the estimated product and labor market imperfection parameters. Findings – Consistent with differences in institutions and in the industrial relations system in the two countries, the authors find regime differences across the two countries and cross-country differences in the levels of product and labor market imperfection parameters within regimes. Originality/value – This study is the first to compare the type and the degree of industry-level product and labor market imperfections inferred from consistent estimation of firm-level production functions in a Latin American and a Western European country. Using firm-level output price indices, the microeconomic production function estimates for Chile are not subject to the omitted output price bias, as is often a major drawback in microeconometric studies of firm behavior. © 2016, © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
AB - Purpose – Institutions, social norms and the nature of industrial relations vary greatly between Latin American and Western European countries. Such institutional and organizational differences might shape firms’ operational environment in general and the type of competition in product and labor markets in particular. The purpose of this paper is to identify and quantify industry differences in product and labor market imperfections in Chile and France. Design/methodology/approach – The authors rely on two extensions of Hall’s econometric framework for estimating price-cost margins by nesting three labor market settings (LMS) (perfect competition (PC) or right-to-manage bargaining, efficient bargaining (EB) and monopsony). Using an unbalanced panel of 1,737 firms over the period 1996-2003 in Chile and 14,270 firms over the period 1994-2001 in France, the authors first classify 20 comparable manufacturing industries in six distinct regimes that differ in the type of competition prevailing in product and labor markets. The authors then investigate industry differences in the estimated product and labor market imperfection parameters. Findings – Consistent with differences in institutions and in the industrial relations system in the two countries, the authors find regime differences across the two countries and cross-country differences in the levels of product and labor market imperfection parameters within regimes. Originality/value – This study is the first to compare the type and the degree of industry-level product and labor market imperfections inferred from consistent estimation of firm-level production functions in a Latin American and a Western European country. Using firm-level output price indices, the microeconomic production function estimates for Chile are not subject to the omitted output price bias, as is often a major drawback in microeconometric studies of firm behavior. © 2016, © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
KW - Monopsony
KW - Panel data
KW - Price-cost mark-ups
KW - Production function
KW - Rent sharing
KW - COST
KW - PANEL-DATA
KW - MODELS
KW - PRICE
KW - POWER
KW - EMPLOYMENT
U2 - 10.1108/IJM-12-2014-0264
DO - 10.1108/IJM-12-2014-0264
M3 - Article
SN - 0143-7720
VL - 37
SP - 229
EP - 252
JO - International Journal of Manpower
JF - International Journal of Manpower
IS - 2
ER -