@article{ea0c76a20cfe44e2b7e8d1f79a0d54c6,
title = "Mechanisms of resistance after crizotinib or second-generation ALK therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer",
abstract = "Compared with crizotinib, next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) reported improved progression free survival (PFS) and higher intracranial activity, becoming the new standard of care in the first-line treatment of advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. As there are several ALK-TKI, upon progression, the optimal sequential ALK TKI strategy at progression is relevant, and this may have an impact on patients' outcome. Secondary ALK resistance mutation subtypes have a prognostic and predictive value and are crucial for the selection of the optimal sequential ALK-TKI. In the current review we summarize the mechanism of acquired resistance (AR) in crizotinib-refractory tumors as well as after second-generation ALK TKI with a focus on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis. This liquid biopsy may provide real-time information on the molecular evolution of the disease upon ALK-TKI therapy, which may guide clinicians in their sequencing approaches instead of blinded treatment decisions. Indeed, ctDNA analysis at progression on ALK TKI has reported other than acquired ALK mutations such as MET amplification. Future challenges are to elucidate the ALK mutation portrait when next generation ALK TKI are used in the first-line setting, as well as the efficacy of MET inhibitors in the subset of tumors with acquired MET amplification.",
keywords = "Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (advanced NSCLC), Alectinib, Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), Brigatinib, Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), Liquid biopsy, Lorlatinib",
author = "Jordi Remon and Laura Esteller and Hendriks, {Lizza E.L.}",
note = "Funding Information: ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://pcm. amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/pcm-20-33/coif). The series “ALK and ROS-1 NSCLC Patients Treatment Approach Based on Genomic Profile by Liquid Biopsy” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. LELH.serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Precision Cancer Medicine from February 2021 to January 2023. LELH reports other from boehringer ingelheim, other from BMS, other from Roche Genentech, other from BMS, grants from Roche Genentech, grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, other from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Quadia, grants from Astra Zeneca, other from Eli Lilly, other from Roche Genentech, other from Pfizer, other from MSD, other from Takeda, non-financial support from AstraZeneca, non-financial support from Novartis, non-financial support from BMS, non-financial support from MSD/Merck, non-financial support from GSK, non-financial support from Takeda, non-financial support from Blueprint Medicines, non-financial support from Roche Genentech, outside the submitted work. JR reports other from MSD, other from BOEHRINGER, other from PFIZER, personal fees and other from OSE IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, other from BMS, other from ASTRAZENECA, other from ROCHE, outside the submitted work. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Precision Cancer Medicine. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.21037/pcm-20-33",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "Precision Cancer Medicine",
issn = "2617-2216",
publisher = "AME Publishing Company",
}