TY - JOUR
T1 - Management of Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Clinical Practice and Challenging Scenarios
AU - Lucà, Fabiana
AU - Oliva, Fabrizio
AU - Abrignani, Maurizio Giuseppe
AU - Di Fusco, Stefania Angela
AU - Parrini, Iris
AU - Canale, Maria Laura
AU - Giubilato, Simona
AU - Cornara, Stefano
AU - Nesti, Martina
AU - Rao, Carmelo Massimiliano
AU - Pozzi, Andrea
AU - Binaghi, Giulio
AU - Maloberti, Alessandro
AU - Ceravolo, Roberto
AU - Bisceglia, Irma
AU - Rossini, Roberta
AU - Temporelli, Pier Luigi
AU - Amico, Antonio Francesco
AU - Calvanese, Raimondo
AU - Gelsomino, Sandro
AU - Riccio, Carmine
AU - Grimaldi, Massimo
AU - Colivicchi, Furio
AU - Gulizia, Michele Massimo
PY - 2023/9/13
Y1 - 2023/9/13
N2 - It is well established that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the cornerstone of anticoagulant strategy in atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) and should be preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) since they are superior or non-inferior to VKAs in reducing thromboembolic risk and are associated with a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage (IH). In addition, many factors, such as fewer pharmacokinetic interactions and less need for monitoring, contribute to the favor of this therapeutic strategy. Although DOACs represent a more suitable option, several issues should be considered in clinical practice, including drug-drug interactions (DDIs), switching to other antithrombotic therapies, preprocedural and postprocedural periods, and the use in patients with chronic renal and liver failure and in those with cancer. Furthermore, adherence to DOACs appears to remain suboptimal. This narrative review aims to provide a practical guide for DOAC prescription and address challenging scenarios.
AB - It is well established that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the cornerstone of anticoagulant strategy in atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) and should be preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) since they are superior or non-inferior to VKAs in reducing thromboembolic risk and are associated with a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage (IH). In addition, many factors, such as fewer pharmacokinetic interactions and less need for monitoring, contribute to the favor of this therapeutic strategy. Although DOACs represent a more suitable option, several issues should be considered in clinical practice, including drug-drug interactions (DDIs), switching to other antithrombotic therapies, preprocedural and postprocedural periods, and the use in patients with chronic renal and liver failure and in those with cancer. Furthermore, adherence to DOACs appears to remain suboptimal. This narrative review aims to provide a practical guide for DOAC prescription and address challenging scenarios.
KW - Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation (CAAF)
KW - Over-Weight Patients
KW - Under-Weight Patients
KW - adherence
KW - atrial fibrillation (AF)
KW - cancer
KW - chronic kidney disease (CKD)
KW - chronic liver disease (CLD)
KW - direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
KW - drug–drug interactions (DDIs)
KW - dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)
KW - elderly
KW - frailty
KW - implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation
KW - malignancy
KW - non-cardiac surgery
KW - obesity
KW - pacemaker
KW - triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT)
KW - vitamin K antagonists (VKAs)
U2 - 10.3390/jcm12185955
DO - 10.3390/jcm12185955
M3 - (Systematic) Review article
SN - 2077-0383
VL - 12
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine
IS - 18
M1 - 5955
ER -