Locally recurrent rectal cancer: Oncological outcomes for patients with a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy

Stefi Nordkamp*, Floor Piqeur, Kim van den Berg, Jip L. Tolenaar, Irene E. G. van Hellemond, Geert-Jan Creemers, Mark Roef, Gesina van Lijnschoten, Jeltsje S. Cnossen, Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen, Johanne G. Bloemen, Lien Coolen, Joost Nederend, Heike M. U. Peulen, Harm J. T. Rutten, Jacobus W. A. Burger

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: For patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer, it is an ongoing pursuit to establish factors predicting or improving oncological outcomes. In locally advanced rectal cancer, a pCR appears to be associated with improved outcomes. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare the oncological outcomes of patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer with and without a pCR. Methods: Patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment and surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer with curative intent between January 2004 and June 2020 at a tertiary referral hospital were analysed. Primary outcomes included overall survival, disease-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and local re-recurrence-free survival, stratified according to whether the patient had a pCR. Results: Of a total of 345 patients, 51 (14.8 per cent) had a pCR. Median follow-up was 36 (i.q.r. 16-60) months. The 3-year overall survival rate was 77 per cent for patients with a pCR and 51.1 per cent for those without (P < 0.001). The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 56 per cent for patients with a pCR and 26.1 per cent for those without (P < 0.001). The 3-year local re-recurrence-free survival rate was 82 and 44 per cent respectively (P < 0.001). Surgical procedures (for example soft tissue, sacrum, and urogenital organ resections) and postoperative complications were comparable between patients with and without a pCR. Conclusion: This study showed that patients with a pCR have superior oncological outcomes to those without a pCR. It may therefore be safe to consider a watch-and-wait approach in highly selected patients, potentially improving quality of life by omitting extensive surgical procedures without compromising oncological outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)950-957
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume110
Issue number8
Early online date1 May 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2023

Keywords

  • TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION
  • CLINICAL COMPLETE RESPONDERS
  • QUALITY-OF-LIFE
  • PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY
  • INTERNATIONAL WATCH
  • WAIT DATABASE
  • OPEN-LABEL
  • SURGERY
  • CHEMOTHERAPY
  • MULTICENTER

Cite this