Jurisdiction ratione temporis in successive international investment agreements: What can China and Chinese investors learn from the Ping An Case?

Chunlei Zhao

doi:10.14330/cwr.2017.3.1.03

Jurisdiction ratione temporis in successive international investment agreements: What can China and Chinese investors learn from the Ping An Case?

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	61-90
Journal	China and WTO Review
Volume	3
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.14330/cwr.2017.3.1.03
Publication status	Published - 2017

Access to Document

10.14330/cwr.2017.3.1.03Licence: CC BY-NC

Cite this

@article{676064fbc0104b349d4812e689e5d3e8,

title = "Jurisdiction ratione temporis in successive international investment agreements: What can China and Chinese investors learn from the Ping An Case?",

author = "Chunlei Zhao",

year = "2017",

doi = "10.14330/cwr.2017.3.1.03",

language = "English",

volume = "3",

pages = "61--90",

journal = "China and WTO Review",

issn = "2383-8221",