John Mayne and Rules of Thumb for Contribution Analysis: A Comparison With Two Related Approaches

Frans L. Leeuw

doi:10.3138/cjpe.75448

John Mayne and Rules of Thumb for Contribution Analysis: A Comparison With Two Related Approaches

Frans L. Leeuw^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

This article discusses differences and similarities between (methodological) rules of thumb of contribution analysis, realist evaluation, and the policy-scientific approach to (program) evaluations. John Mayne's work and his operating procedures are presented and structured. One of the conclusions is that the three approaches form a 'family.' This 'family' can substantially contribute to at least six of the 10 "declarations of the Program Theory Manifesto" presented in 2019.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	403-421
Number of pages	19
Journal	Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation
Volume	37
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.75448
Publication status	Published - 1 Mar 2023

Keywords

contribution analysis
theory-driven evaluations
realist evaluation
policy-scientific approach
John Mayne
INTERVENTIONS

Access to Document

10.3138/cjpe.75448

Cite this

@article{9a43dafea86b4c0b899a18b0c1b5c684,

title = "John Mayne and Rules of Thumb for Contribution Analysis: A Comparison With Two Related Approaches",

abstract = "This article discusses differences and similarities between (methodological) rules of thumb of contribution analysis, realist evaluation, and the policy-scientific approach to (program) evaluations. John Mayne's work and his operating procedures are presented and structured. One of the conclusions is that the three approaches form a 'family.' This 'family' can substantially contribute to at least six of the 10 {"}declarations of the Program Theory Manifesto{"} presented in 2019.",

keywords = "contribution analysis, theory-driven evaluations, realist evaluation, policy-scientific approach, John Mayne, INTERVENTIONS",

author = "Leeuw, {Frans L.}",

year = "2023",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.3138/cjpe.75448",

language = "English",

volume = "37",

pages = "403--421",

journal = "Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation",

issn = "0834-1516",

publisher = "Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - John Mayne and Rules of Thumb for Contribution Analysis: A Comparison With Two Related Approaches

AU - Leeuw, Frans L.

PY - 2023/3/1

Y1 - 2023/3/1

N2 - This article discusses differences and similarities between (methodological) rules of thumb of contribution analysis, realist evaluation, and the policy-scientific approach to (program) evaluations. John Mayne's work and his operating procedures are presented and structured. One of the conclusions is that the three approaches form a 'family.' This 'family' can substantially contribute to at least six of the 10 "declarations of the Program Theory Manifesto" presented in 2019.

AB - This article discusses differences and similarities between (methodological) rules of thumb of contribution analysis, realist evaluation, and the policy-scientific approach to (program) evaluations. John Mayne's work and his operating procedures are presented and structured. One of the conclusions is that the three approaches form a 'family.' This 'family' can substantially contribute to at least six of the 10 "declarations of the Program Theory Manifesto" presented in 2019.

KW - contribution analysis

KW - theory-driven evaluations

KW - realist evaluation

KW - policy-scientific approach

KW - John Mayne

KW - INTERVENTIONS

U2 - 10.3138/cjpe.75448

DO - 10.3138/cjpe.75448

M3 - Article

SN - 0834-1516

VL - 37

SP - 403

EP - 421

JO - Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation

JF - Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation

IS - 3

ER -

John Mayne and Rules of Thumb for Contribution Analysis: A Comparison With Two Related Approaches

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this