TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementing Electronic Health Records in Germany: Lessons (Yet to Be) Learned
AU - Schmitt, T.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by the Robert Bosch Foundation. The Foundation had no role in the study design, execution, analysis, and writing of the paper. I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Kai Wegrich from the Hertie School who has been a source of inspiration and support. I also wish to thank the two reviewers for their valuable and constructive comments.
Funding Information:
For the secondary use of health data, if organising educational and information campaigns is one side of the coin, ensuring a high level of information literacy and trust of citizens on health matters is the other. Information literacy can be described as individuals’ ability to find, retrieve, analyse and use relevant information. Health literacy, as a specific field of information literacy, focuses on health sciences and health communication. It implies the achievement of a certain level of knowledge, personal skills and confidence to take action to improve personal and public health [73]. According to the statistics of a comprehensive country comparison report from Europe, only 28% of the population in Germany has sufficient or excellent health literacy; the lowest among the 17 European countries that participated in the comparative study and 27 percentage points below average [74]. Germany has been investing in improving the health literacy of the population through Nationaler Aktionsplan Gesundheitskompetenz, a project funded by the Robert Bosch Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s).
PY - 2023/1/1
Y1 - 2023/1/1
N2 - Introduction: Ensuring access to the right information at the right time can improve the safety, effectiveness and efficiency of care. A systematic and detailed collection of patient records, commonly known as electronic health records (EHRs), forms the core of the information system architecture in integrated health systems.Description: Since January 2021, seventeen years after the German legislation to implement EHRs (elektronische Patientenakte; ePA) came into force, the sickness funds in Germany have been offering their enrollees a downloadable application with which patients can access their personal EHRs through an electronic device. Looking at the ePA adoption process, it is now safe to argue that the deployment has been anything but successful. After two years of the launch, the number of ePA users amounts to not even 1% of the insured population in Germany, failing to move the needle on integrated care and health data integration. Based on a public policy theory, this article analyses the factors that are influencing the ePA implementation and secondary use of ePA data.Discussion: As the German experience shows, the feasibility of digital health projects depends on several contextual factors: countries with a high degree of self-governance and federal structures have to manage complex coordination processes that often slow down or otherwise impede digitalisation processes. In addition, cultural peculiarities such as concerns about data protection and security can be a hindering factor for digitalisation. Whereas the new German government and European initiatives such as the European Health Data Space (EHDS) create an advantageous situation for the ePA implementation and secondary use of health data, the structural and cultural issues in Germany should be acknowledged and tackled.Conclusion: Concerning the structural factors, a further reorganisation of the board of gematik, the key organisation of digital health solutions in Germany, should be considered. Cultural factors in Germany affect especially the secondary use of data; organising information campaigns, investing in (digital) health literacy of the population and designing a user-friendly ePA application are central in this context.
AB - Introduction: Ensuring access to the right information at the right time can improve the safety, effectiveness and efficiency of care. A systematic and detailed collection of patient records, commonly known as electronic health records (EHRs), forms the core of the information system architecture in integrated health systems.Description: Since January 2021, seventeen years after the German legislation to implement EHRs (elektronische Patientenakte; ePA) came into force, the sickness funds in Germany have been offering their enrollees a downloadable application with which patients can access their personal EHRs through an electronic device. Looking at the ePA adoption process, it is now safe to argue that the deployment has been anything but successful. After two years of the launch, the number of ePA users amounts to not even 1% of the insured population in Germany, failing to move the needle on integrated care and health data integration. Based on a public policy theory, this article analyses the factors that are influencing the ePA implementation and secondary use of ePA data.Discussion: As the German experience shows, the feasibility of digital health projects depends on several contextual factors: countries with a high degree of self-governance and federal structures have to manage complex coordination processes that often slow down or otherwise impede digitalisation processes. In addition, cultural peculiarities such as concerns about data protection and security can be a hindering factor for digitalisation. Whereas the new German government and European initiatives such as the European Health Data Space (EHDS) create an advantageous situation for the ePA implementation and secondary use of health data, the structural and cultural issues in Germany should be acknowledged and tackled.Conclusion: Concerning the structural factors, a further reorganisation of the board of gematik, the key organisation of digital health solutions in Germany, should be considered. Cultural factors in Germany affect especially the secondary use of data; organising information campaigns, investing in (digital) health literacy of the population and designing a user-friendly ePA application are central in this context.
KW - electronic health records
KW - innovation uptake
KW - health data governance
KW - integrated care
KW - data integration
KW - national health system
KW - Germany
KW - PATIENT
KW - CARE
U2 - 10.5334/ijic.6578
DO - 10.5334/ijic.6578
M3 - Article
SN - 1568-4156
VL - 23
JO - International Journal of Integrated Care
JF - International Journal of Integrated Care
IS - 1
M1 - 13
ER -