Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial)

M. N. van IJsselmuiden*, A. M. J. van Oudheusden, J. Veen, G. van de Pol, A. Vollebregt, C. M. Radder, S. Housmans, S. M. J. van Kuijk, J. Deprest, M. Y. Bongers, H. W. F. van Eijndhoven

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1284-1293
Number of pages10
JournalBjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume127
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2020

Keywords

  • Apical prolapse
  • hysteropexy
  • laparoscopic
  • mesh
  • uterine prolapse
  • uterine suspension
  • PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE
  • QUALITY-OF-LIFE
  • VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY
  • UTEROVAGINAL PROLAPSE
  • URODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT
  • FOLLOW-UP
  • WOMEN
  • INCONTINENCE
  • SACROCOLPOPEXY
  • SUSPENSION

Cite this