Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms: the role of openness and innovativeness

Ann-Kristin Zobel, Boris Lokshin, John Hagedoorn

Research output: Working paperProfessional

874 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper analyses how firms’ degree of openness and innovativeness influence their use of formal and informal appropriation mechanisms. Patents, trademarks, copyrights, and design rights are formal appropriation mechanisms. Secrecy, lead-time, and complexity are examples of informal appropriation mechanisms. Both external search breadth and depth are positively associated with firms’ use of informal appropriation mechanisms, while only external search breadth is positively associated with formal appropriation mechanisms. Firms’ degree of radical (incremental) innovation orientation is negatively (positively) associated with their use of formal appropriation mechanisms. Analysis of the joint impact of openness and innovativeness, suggests that for radical innovators it is external search breadth (rather than depth) that has a positive association with the use of informal appropriation mechanisms. In contrast, for radical innovators external search depth (rather than breadth) is associated with the use of formal appropriation mechanisms. For incremental innovators, external search breadth (rather than depth) is associated with the use of both formal and informal appropriation mechanisms.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherMaastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Appropriation Mechanisms
  • Formal Appropriation
  • Informal Appropriation
  • External Search Openness
  • Incremental Innovators
  • Radical Innovators

Cite this

Zobel, A-K., Lokshin, B., & Hagedoorn, J. (2016). Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms: the role of openness and innovativeness. Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics.
Zobel, Ann-Kristin ; Lokshin, Boris ; Hagedoorn, John. / Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms: the role of openness and innovativeness. Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics, 2016.
@techreport{4f6bca5c110641d484451492375e1bb9,
title = "Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms: the role of openness and innovativeness",
abstract = "This paper analyses how firms’ degree of openness and innovativeness influence their use of formal and informal appropriation mechanisms. Patents, trademarks, copyrights, and design rights are formal appropriation mechanisms. Secrecy, lead-time, and complexity are examples of informal appropriation mechanisms. Both external search breadth and depth are positively associated with firms’ use of informal appropriation mechanisms, while only external search breadth is positively associated with formal appropriation mechanisms. Firms’ degree of radical (incremental) innovation orientation is negatively (positively) associated with their use of formal appropriation mechanisms. Analysis of the joint impact of openness and innovativeness, suggests that for radical innovators it is external search breadth (rather than depth) that has a positive association with the use of informal appropriation mechanisms. In contrast, for radical innovators external search depth (rather than breadth) is associated with the use of formal appropriation mechanisms. For incremental innovators, external search breadth (rather than depth) is associated with the use of both formal and informal appropriation mechanisms.",
keywords = "Appropriation Mechanisms, Formal Appropriation, Informal Appropriation, External Search Openness, Incremental Innovators, Radical Innovators",
author = "Ann-Kristin Zobel and Boris Lokshin and John Hagedoorn",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
publisher = "Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics",
address = "Netherlands",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics",

}

Zobel, A-K, Lokshin, B & Hagedoorn, J 2016 'Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms: the role of openness and innovativeness' Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics.

Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms: the role of openness and innovativeness. / Zobel, Ann-Kristin; Lokshin, Boris; Hagedoorn, John.

Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics, 2016.

Research output: Working paperProfessional

TY - UNPB

T1 - Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms: the role of openness and innovativeness

AU - Zobel, Ann-Kristin

AU - Lokshin, Boris

AU - Hagedoorn, John

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This paper analyses how firms’ degree of openness and innovativeness influence their use of formal and informal appropriation mechanisms. Patents, trademarks, copyrights, and design rights are formal appropriation mechanisms. Secrecy, lead-time, and complexity are examples of informal appropriation mechanisms. Both external search breadth and depth are positively associated with firms’ use of informal appropriation mechanisms, while only external search breadth is positively associated with formal appropriation mechanisms. Firms’ degree of radical (incremental) innovation orientation is negatively (positively) associated with their use of formal appropriation mechanisms. Analysis of the joint impact of openness and innovativeness, suggests that for radical innovators it is external search breadth (rather than depth) that has a positive association with the use of informal appropriation mechanisms. In contrast, for radical innovators external search depth (rather than breadth) is associated with the use of formal appropriation mechanisms. For incremental innovators, external search breadth (rather than depth) is associated with the use of both formal and informal appropriation mechanisms.

AB - This paper analyses how firms’ degree of openness and innovativeness influence their use of formal and informal appropriation mechanisms. Patents, trademarks, copyrights, and design rights are formal appropriation mechanisms. Secrecy, lead-time, and complexity are examples of informal appropriation mechanisms. Both external search breadth and depth are positively associated with firms’ use of informal appropriation mechanisms, while only external search breadth is positively associated with formal appropriation mechanisms. Firms’ degree of radical (incremental) innovation orientation is negatively (positively) associated with their use of formal appropriation mechanisms. Analysis of the joint impact of openness and innovativeness, suggests that for radical innovators it is external search breadth (rather than depth) that has a positive association with the use of informal appropriation mechanisms. In contrast, for radical innovators external search depth (rather than breadth) is associated with the use of formal appropriation mechanisms. For incremental innovators, external search breadth (rather than depth) is associated with the use of both formal and informal appropriation mechanisms.

KW - Appropriation Mechanisms

KW - Formal Appropriation

KW - Informal Appropriation

KW - External Search Openness

KW - Incremental Innovators

KW - Radical Innovators

M3 - Working paper

BT - Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms: the role of openness and innovativeness

PB - Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics

ER -

Zobel A-K, Lokshin B, Hagedoorn J. Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms: the role of openness and innovativeness. Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics. 2016.