Financial Power and Democratic Legitimacy: How to Think Realistically about Public Debt

Janosch Prinz*, Enzo Rossi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

113 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

To what extent are questions of sovereign debt a matter for political rather than scientific or moral adjudication? We answer that question by defending three claims. We argue that (i) moral and technocratic takes on sovereign debt tend to be ideological in a pejorative sense of the term, and that therefore (ii) sovereign debt should be politicised all the way down. We then show that this sort of politicisation need not boil down to the crude Realpolitik of debtor-creditor power relations—a conclusion that would leave no room for normative theory, among other problems. Rather, we argue that (iii) in a democratic context, a realist approach to politics centred on what Bernard Williams calls ‘The Basic Legitimation Demand’ affords a deliberative approach to the normative evaluation of public debt policy options.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-140
JournalSocial Theory and Practice
Volume48
Issue number1
Early online date4 Dec 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Financial Power and Democratic Legitimacy: How to Think Realistically about Public Debt'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this